LOCAL GOVERNMENT MODERNIZATION IN GERMANY: BETWEEN INCREMENTALISM AND REFORM WAVES
Article Abstract:
In taking a historical-institutionalist approach, this paper looks at the development of administrative reforms in German local government which, because of the comparatively high degree of political and administrative decentralization of the Federal Republic has played a crucial role in the latter's entire politico-administrative setting and, hence, in its institutional reforms. The paper mainly identifies three stages in the post-war development of administrative reforms. During the `planning movement' of the late 1960s and early 1970s, Germany's local level government and administration underwent significant and, to a considerable degree, lasting institutional changes. The 1980s were a period of incrementalist adaptation. Since the beginning of the 1990s, conspicuously later than in the Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian countries, but earlier and faster than the federal and the Lander levels, Germany's local government has embarked upon dramatic changes particularly on two scores. First, in a growing number of municipalities and counties, administrative modernization was incorporated under the heading of a `New Steering Model' (NSM) that largely drew on the dominant international New Public Management (NPM) debate. The dynamics of the ongoing administrative reforms are marked by an `amalgamation' of NPM/NSM and earlier (`traditional') reform concepts. Secondly, at the same time, the political institutions of local government have undergone a significant shift as a result of the introduction of direct democratic procedures (direct election of mayors and heads of counties, binding local referenda). The paper argues that it is this co-incidence and co-evolution of administrative and political reforms that make for the peculiarity of Germany's current modernization trajectory, distinguishing it from the Anglo-Saxon and, to a lesser degree, from the Scandinavian modernization paths.
Publication Name: Public Administration
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0033-3298
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS: AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON
Article Abstract:
Differences in management of the public and private sectors are examined in the light of pressure on public sector managers to emulate private sector practices. Human resource management patterns in the two sectors are reviewed.
Publication Name: Public Administration
Subject: Political science
ISSN: 0033-3298
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: `REGULATION RUN MAD': THE BOARD OF TRADE AND THE LOSS OF THE TITANIC. THE EMERGENCE OF MULTI-INSPECTORATE INSPECTIONS: `GOING IT ALONE IS NOT AN OPTION'
- Abstracts: PARTNERSHIP AND POLICY NETWORKS IN RURAL LOCAL GOVERNANCE: HOMELESSNESS IN TAUNTON. TRANSPORT POLICY PARADIGMS AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: THE NORWICH INNER RING ROAD
- Abstracts: EXPENDITURE INFLEXIBILITY IN THE STATE BUDGET: THE FISCAL POLICY LATITUDE OF THE COUNCIL OF STATE IN FINLAND. MANAGING THE BUDGETARY PROCESS IN A HUNG COUNCIL
- Abstracts: PROGRESSIVE REGIMES, PARTNERSHIPS AND THE INVOLVEMENT OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES: A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION
- Abstracts: THE CHANGING NATURE OF RATIONING IN THE UK NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE. EXPLORING CONTRACTS AS REINVENTED INSTITUTIONS IN THE DANISH PUBLIC SECTOR