Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Retail industry

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Retail industry

Let private pockets pay

Article Abstract:

There was considerable public outcry when it was revealed that Kevin and Ian Maxwell have already received more than 4 million pounds sterling in legal aid, even though their trial has not even started yet. This case, coming after a number of other similar ones, should prompt a reassessment of how legal aid is administered and regulated. However, the Lord Chancellor was unwise to comment on the legal aid issue in this way, as he implied that a fraud could have taken place but seems unprepared to take action to pursue the matter.

Author: Smith, Roger
Publisher: Financial Times Ltd.
Publication Name: The Independent
Subject: Retail industry
ISSN: 0951-9467
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


How Maxwell flies high as lawyers' fees soar past 4m pounds sterling

Article Abstract:

The revelation that Kevin and Ian Maxwell, who are currently among six defendants who are receiving large sums in legal aid, are working as consultants to Westbourne Communications, a private company which specialises in supplying financial advice to business people in eastern Europe, has increased the controversy surrounding their activities. Concern has already been growing for some time about the sums of legal aid going to high-profile cases, and eligibility is soon to be made stricter for most applicants.

Author: Hellier, David
Publisher: Financial Times Ltd.
Publication Name: The Independent
Subject: Retail industry
ISSN: 0951-9467
Year: 1995
Maxwell, Ian

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Uneasy silence in court

Article Abstract:

Every citizen has the right of silence, an ancient privilege against self-incrimination similar to the US Fifth Amendment. In criminal offences, theft or criminal damage to property and cases involving intellectual property rights are excepted. The supremacy of Parliament is the fundamental principle of Britain's constitution. Parliament should intervene where the privilege is available to a person likely to be charged with conspiracy, as in the Maxwell Brothers' case.

Author: Arnheim, Michael
Publisher: Financial Times Ltd.
Publication Name: The Independent
Subject: Retail industry
ISSN: 0951-9467
Year: 1992
Civil rights, Silence (Law), Self-incrimination, Self incrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Legal aid, Cases, Maxwell, Kevin
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Getting the hang of Kelly. Roy Lichtenstein. Five steps to married bliss
  • Abstracts: Scott on trial: the case for the defence. A camera obscured. Chairs moved, a desk rifled, computers 'faulty': Had the Lawrence inquiry report been stolen?
  • Abstracts: Tom Eckersley. Maurice Rickards. Eric Ayers
  • Abstracts: The Einstein of Ecstasy. John Major's duty to his Queen
  • Abstracts: The enterprising stakeholder. Unipalm leads the pack through Internet gateway. Pointers to robust growth
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.