Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Social sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Social sciences

Live art and the audience: toward a speaker-focused freedom of expression

Article Abstract:

The government should not use audience-oriented standards to determine whether live art should be subject to First Amendment protection from laws regulating obscene or indecent speech. Artistic speakers should be allowed to consider art on their own terms and their sincerity in declaring an expression to be artistic should be always be given First Amendment protection. Courts should restrict artistic expression only if it poses a danger unrelated to the message of the artistic speech.

Author: Kurzweg, Anne Salzman
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1999
Analysis, Freedom of speech, Performance art, Obscenity (Law), Obscenity, Freedom and art, Artistic freedom

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real

Article Abstract:

Women will have to develop political strategies in order to establish the right for them to control their reproductive choices by law and in the courts. Past political struggles that women have fought, such as their campaign to win the right to vote, to legalize birth control and abortion, and the failure to pass the Equal Rights Amendment to the Constitution, reveal techniques women must adapt to their present fight to keep abortion legal and prevent restrictions on its access.

Author: Law, Sylvia A., Pine, Rachael N.
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 1992
Political aspects, Human reproduction, Pro-choice movement

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


"The sexual freedom cases"? Contraception, abortion, abstinence, and the Constitution

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the theories behind Supreme Court rulings invalidating laws restricting the sexual freedom of mixed -sex couples, including antiabortion and anticontraception laws.

Author: Cruz, David B.
Publisher: Harvard Law School
Publication Name: Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0017-8039
Year: 2000
Contraception

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Abortion
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Cognitive complexity and the perceived dimensionality of pay satisfaction. Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: a reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods
  • Abstracts: The tea and toast syndrome: Psychosocial aspects of congregate dining. Depression and vision and hearing impairments in later life
  • Abstracts: Epilogue. The Boston bio-bang: the emergence of a "regional system of innovation". Evolutionary theory in the administrative sciences: introduction
  • Abstracts: Spatial price discrimination and the merger paradox. Sectoral spillovers and the price of land: a cost analysis
  • Abstracts: Practices and actions: a Wittgensteinian critique of Bourdieu and Giddens. The accidental derogation of the lay actor: a critique of Giddens's concept of structure
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.