Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Banking, finance and accounting industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Banking, finance and accounting industries

Professional privilege and 'aggressive tax planning.'

Article Abstract:

There may be circumstances when Australian taxpayers enter into legal professional privilege with lawyers. The case involved a decision by the country's tax office to charge a lawyer named Coombes with the failure to comply with a section 264 notice. The tax office had wanted Coombes to submit the names and addresses of clients who had participated in a certain tax planning arrangement. However, it was determined that the communications between Coombes and the clients constituted privileged communications.

Author: Richards, Robert
Publisher: Australian Society of Practising Accountants
Publication Name: Australian CPA
Subject: Banking, finance and accounting industries
ISSN: 1440-8880
Year: 1999
Legal services, Attorneys, Offices of Lawyers, Laws, regulations and rules, Lawyers, Tax planning, Law firms, Confidential communications

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Ralph Committee goes shopping

Article Abstract:

The Ralph Committee will provide the Australian government with a list of tax options that could result in changes to the way citizens are taxed in the country. The committee, which has no power to implement the tax suggestions, identified many issues that the government could consider for reform. Some of these issues include handling goodwill, wasting assets, and trading stock.

Author: Richards, Robert
Publisher: Australian Society of Practising Accountants
Publication Name: Australian CPA
Subject: Banking, finance and accounting industries
ISSN: 1440-8880
Year: 1999
Column, Tax reform

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Deductibility of interest - the Steele decision

Article Abstract:

An Australian taxpayer named Mrs. Steele tried to take a tax deduction for property that was sold because the taxpayer could not use the land the way that she wanted. The taxpayer lost the case, lost the appeal but did not lose the appeal to the Full Federal Court.

Author: Richards, Robert
Publisher: Australian Society of Practising Accountants
Publication Name: Australian CPA
Subject: Banking, finance and accounting industries
ISSN: 1440-8880
Year: 1999
Land Subdivision and Land Development, Subdividers & Developers, Subdividers and Developers, Real estate developers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Australia, Cases, Tax policy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Beyond good and evil. Welcome to the master class
  • Abstracts: I just called to say.... The safe option. Sell-off or sell-out?
  • Abstracts: Workplace legislation is a quick fix, argues US expert. The day after
  • Abstracts: Shareholder value: interpretations for a way ahead. The bug's bite gets bigger. Accounting for the 'bug': rules to know
  • Abstracts: IASC harmonisation: one step forward, two steps back? Harmonisation and China: problems aplenty. Accelerated Masters Program - advantages for CPAs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.