Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Biological sciences

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Biological sciences

The fruit fly: a model organism to study the genetics of alcohol abuse and addiction?

Article Abstract:

The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, has been used in the investigation of the physiology of alcoholism. A number of studies have postulated the involvement of cyclic AMP (cAMP) in the molecular mechanism of the addiction process. Drosophila studies using an inebriometer and experimental manipulation of cAMP levels reveal that this cyclic nucleotide plays a role in the establishment of alcoholism. Further, there appears to be a genetic predisposition to alcohol tolerance in the fruit fly.

Author: Bellen, Hugo J.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Cell
Subject: Biological sciences
ISSN: 0092-8674
Year: 1998
Physiological aspects, Alcoholism, Drosophila, Cyclic adenylic acid, Cyclic adenosine monophosphate

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Genetics in the age of systems biology

Article Abstract:

Questions are raised regarding the nature of the relationship between forward genetics and systems biology and how holistic are large-scale molecular experiments. Hence, consideration of the timing of the transition from gene discovery to systems biology, the idea of systems biology as an alternative to a reductionist scientific landscape and the relationship between forward genetics, quantitative molecular biology and the systems concept is undertaken.

Author: Hassan, Bassem A., Hiesinger, Peter Robin
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Cell
Subject: Biological sciences
ISSN: 0092-8674
Year: 2005
Molecular Biology, Analysis, Genetic research, Systems biology

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Reasons scientists avoid thinking about ethics

Article Abstract:

Science is one of the most powerful and pervasive forces for change in modern society, and scientists have a unique responsibility to shepherd that change with careful ethical scrutiny of their own behavior and thoughtful advocacy of scientific research. However, scientists are often wary of ethical scrutiny, and generally reluctant to engage the public in moral conversation about their work, offering several reasons for doing so.

Author: Wolpe, Paul Root
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Cell
Subject: Biological sciences
ISSN: 0092-8674
Year: 2006
Public affairs, Ethics, Research Personnel, Ethical aspects, Research ethics, Research scientists

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Similar structural models of the transmembrane proteins of Ebola and avian sarcoma viruses. Recognition of a transmembrane domain: another role for the ribosome?
  • Abstracts: The use of fluorogenic substrates to measure fungal presence and activity in soil. Identification and retting efficiencies of fungi isolated from dew-retted flax in the United States and Europe
  • Abstracts: A model for antagonistic pleiotropic gene action for mortality and advanced age. Linkage analysis of X-linked cone-rod dystrophy: localization to Xp11.4 and definition of a locus distinct from RP2 and RP3
  • Abstracts: Molecular mimicry and the generation of host defense protein diversity. Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases: Influenza as a prototype of the host-pathogen balancing act
  • Abstracts: The making of a compound leaf: genetic manipulation of leaf architecture in tomato. The new bacterial cell biology: Moving parts and subcellular architecture
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.