Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

A new tack is taken by Microsoft; it cites weaknesses in Sun's Java product

Article Abstract:

Microsoft's attorneys, during cross-examination of Sun Microsystems Executive James A. Gosling, attempted to demonstrate that its software rival planned anticompetitive tactics. Gosling's testimony on Dec 3, 1998, is part of the antitrust lawsuit filed in Federal court against Microsoft by the Government and 20 states. Tom Burt, a lawyer representing Microsoft, asked Gosling to discuss Sun executives' 1996 E-mail messages that referred to meetings between Sun and Netscape. Sun at that time was creating a Java-based Web browser software product, Hot Java, while Netscape led the browser market. Gosling acknowledged that companies discuss evolving technologies, but did not recall plans to discontinue Hot Java after meeting with Netscape. Hot Java did not reach the market because Sun believed it could not be profitable given Microsoft's free Internet Explorer browser, according to Gosling.

Author: Brinkley, Joel
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1998
Legal issues & crime, Internet access software, Web browser, Web browsers, Market domination, Market share, Litigation, Lawsuit/litigation, Microsoft Internet Explorer (Web browser), Antitrust Issue

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Microsoft rests its case, ending on a misstep

Article Abstract:

The Microsoft Corp. rested its case in government's antitrust trial after over five months of testimony, and six weeks after the government completed its case. The government has tried to prove that Microsoft intimidated industry competitors and tried to gain competitive advantages with its monopolization of computer operating systems. Robert Muglia, a Microsoft senior vice president, was the final witness and he testified about his company's relationship with Sun Microsystems, the creator and owner of the Java programming language. The government's lead trial lawyer, David Boies, once again was able to trip up a Microsoft witness, getting Mr. Muglia to apparently contradict himself and finally cause the presiding judge to order the witness to stop talking. The case will reconvene in mid-April for several weeks of rebuttal testimony.

Author: Brinkley, Joel
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1999
Software Publishers, Systems Software Pkgs (Micro), Operating systems (Software), Application development software, Practice, Jackson, Thomas Penfield, Contracts, Testimony, Muglia, Robert

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: United States, Computer software industry, Software industry, Company legal issue, Cases, Microsoft Corp., Antitrust law, Sun Microsystems Inc., SUNW, MSFT
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A Microsoft rebuttal but nothing to rebut. Apple executive testifies of threats and bullying by Microsoft
  • Abstracts: Miller and Visa join the ranks of edgy marketers that like to re-examine their agency roster. Mastercard joins the growing crowd that believes what sells here will sell there, too
  • Abstracts: New campaign by Wendy's seeks young dudes with attitudes to munch a bunch of burgers. An explosion of account activity on Madison Ave., even though it was a four-day week
  • Abstracts: Johnson & Johnson could face delay in bringing Benecol products to market
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.