Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Biases in retrospective self-reports of time use: an empirical study of computer users

Article Abstract:

The computer usage self-assessments of 401 information systems managers and professionals are compared with computer-monitored interactive use and connect time. A 32% discrepancy is observed in comparing self-assessed use with logged interactive use. Averages are similar when-self assessments are compared with total connect time. Relatively minimal systems users tend to overestimate their use, while heavy users tend to underestimate their use. The results point to added caution in operationalizing user acceptance through self-reports of time use. Computer-monitored data should be regarded as a component of a multi-method approach rather than as a complete substitute for self-reported measures.

Author: Collopy, Fred
Publisher: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Publication Name: Management Science
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0025-1909
Year: 1996
Analysis, Practice, Time management, User groups

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement

Article Abstract:

A model based on results generated from 618 respondents from 44 firms is developed which focuses on individual differences between computer end users. The model hypothesizes that a contingency relationship exists between desired involvement, perceived involvement, and end-user satisfaction based on the discrepancy concept of participation. The model takes into account past research that has identified that end user computing has been characterized by significant differences between individuals in motivation and skill. Research findings suggest support for the contingency model.

Author: Doll, William J., Torkzadeh, Gholamreza
Publisher: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Publication Name: Management Science
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0025-1909
Year: 1989
Management information systems

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models

Article Abstract:

The ability to predict workers' acceptance of computers from a measure of their intentions is examined. The ability to explain workers' computer use intentions in terms of perceived usefulness, subjective norms, perceived ease of use, and worker attitudes is also examined. Data was collected from a longitudinal study of 107 users. Results indicate that: workers' intentions were influenced by perceived usefulness; workers' intentions were slightly influenced by perceived ease of use; and the effects of beliefs on intentions were only partially mediated by attitudes.

Author: Warshaw, Paul R., Bagozzi, Richard P., Davis, Fred D.
Publisher: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Publication Name: Management Science
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0025-1909
Year: 1989
Management science, Information technology

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Usage, Computers, Digital computers, Research
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Making a case for robust optimization models. An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk
  • Abstracts: Broadcasters urged to try fiber optics as alternative to satellite transmission. Once high-tech toys, cellular telephones are becoming staples; cars, golf courses, even Yosemite can be offices, but at a cost to serenity; why makers' stocks are hot
  • Abstracts: Interactive TV entices many marketers, but so far hype outpaces technology. Computer disks come on line as the latest vehicles for ads
  • Abstracts: West provinces warn Canada on widening of phone jurisdiction. U.K. plans to open phone network to competition
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.