Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Downsizing: what do we know? What have we learned?

Article Abstract:

Approaches to organisation management and design need to be changed to gain benefits from downsizing, or planned job layoffs. Expected economic advantages through downsizing often do not become reality for many companies, particularly in terms of higher investment return and increased profit. Expected organisational advantages such as higher productivity, better communications and reduced overheads also often fail to materialise. Personnel cuts must be made as part of a continuous improvement strategy, where changes can be implemented to eradicate inefficiency and waste.

Author: Cascio, Wayne, F.
Publisher: Academy of Management
Publication Name: The Academy of Management Executive
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0896-3789
Year: 1993
Economic aspects, Industrial organization

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Organizational downsizing: constraining, cloning, learning

Article Abstract:

Downsizing has spread rapidly among American corporations and reached a peak rate for Jan. 1994 that was higher for any other month since 1989. This process of deliberate personnel reduction has been justified as a cost-cutting measure and as an incentive to increase productivity. However, evidence has shown that downsizing negatively affects employee morale and productivity. Institutional theory has identified social factors of constraining, cloning and learning as reasons why firms continue to downsize despite its negative effects.

Author: McKinley, William, Schick, Allen G., Sanchez, Carol M.
Publisher: Academy of Management
Publication Name: The Academy of Management Executive
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0896-3789
Year: 1995
Social aspects, Analysis, Layoffs

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Downsizing and firm performance: panacea or paradise lost?

Article Abstract:

An investigation of corporate downsizing in 537 companies for 12 years revealed that employment downsizing had very little effect on a company's return on assets. On the other hand, asset downsizing increased the return on assets. Taking both employment and asset downsizing into consideration, downsizing had negligible impact on profitability. Downsizing initiatives must systematically consider both human resource and physical assets to maximize the impact of downsizing on return on assets and profitability.

Author: Lowe, Kevin B.
Publisher: Academy of Management
Publication Name: The Academy of Management Executive
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0896-3789
Year: 1998
Management Functions NEC, Research, Organizational change, Career development, Corporate size

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Management, Downsizing (Management)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Focusing on true costs in a service organization. The virtual HR organization
  • Abstracts: Planning of portfolio of projects. Utilization of influence diagram for the design and integration of the construction and measurement control environment
  • Abstracts: Riding out corporate turbulence. Avoiding common pitfalls of reengineering. Corporate research and development strategies: the influence of firm, industry and country factors on the decentralization of R&D
  • Abstracts: From low- to high-tech project management. A model of R&D leadership and team communication: the relationship with project performance
  • Abstracts: Greening and growing - the role of government. On beyond quango: the evolution of business-government cooperation in Northern Ireland
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.