Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

1984 Sony case key to Napster legal strategy

Article Abstract:

The attorneys shaping Napster Inc.'s copyright case are relying on a 1984 US Supreme Court decision allowing Sony Corp. to continue producing its Betamax VCR, ruling that a new technology that could be used for piracy could be allowed provided it also could be used for legal 'substantial noninfringing uses.' Napster is scheduled for an Oct. 2, 2000 hearing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, CA.

Author: Gomes, Lee
Publisher: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wall Street Journal Western Edition
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0193-2241
Year: 2000
Japan, Household audio and video equipment, Consumer Electronics, Audio and Video Equipment Manufacturing, Consumer electronics industry, Sony Corp., SNE, United States. Supreme Court

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Napster, fighting for survival, to make case before appeals panel

Article Abstract:

Napster Inc. will appear before the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit where the company hopes to make available unauthorized music on its swapping service. Russell J. Frackman is representing the sound recording industry in the copyright infringement case against Napster. Though many are betting against Napster's chances, some think the company has an argument under the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

Author: Gomes, Lee
Publisher: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wall Street Journal Western Edition
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0193-2241
Year: 2000
United States. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, Frackman, Russell J.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Judge sharply criticizes Napster's effort to block copyrighted music on its site

Article Abstract:

U.S. District Court Judge Marilyn Hall Patel is angry at Napster for hundreds of song titles that are still available on its computers. The online music site has failed to block copyrighted material from being downloaded. Judge Patel appointed A.J. Nichols to mediate between Napster and the sound recording industry. Napster continues its legal argument involving a Sony Betamax ruling from the Supreme Court in 1984 on copyright infringement.

Author: Gomes, Lee
Publisher: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wall Street Journal Western Edition
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0193-2241
Year: 2001
Legal issues & crime, Practice, Online music, Patel, Marilyn Hall

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Company legal issue, Cases, Online services, Internet services, Copyright, Copyrights, Napster Inc., Sound recording industry, Recording industry, Sound recordings
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Record industry files court papers saying Napster isn't effectively blocking music. Studios fight software used to copy DVDs
  • Abstracts: Courtroom battles will continue but time is on Microsoft's side. EC accuses Microsoft on 'server' sector
  • Abstracts: Hughes Electronics may get $1 billion in extra revenue from ICO satellites. ... is a call that will bolster Flextronics
  • Abstracts: Love bug prompts security experts to poke at Microsoft's weak points; too many Microsoft programs were designed for stand-alone PCs, experts say
  • Abstracts: Tech firms reboot with gadgets; with Web-only efforts failing, companies try digital pens, robots and smart software
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.