Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Microsoft trial looks at AOL-Netscape; judge says pending accord may affect the market; new evidence weighed

Article Abstract:

US District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, who is presiding over the Microsoft antitrust trial, surprised the court by saying that America Online's (AOL) bid to acquire Netscape for $4.2 billion could impact the technology market. Jackson, who usually has favored the plaintiff Justice Department and 19 states with his prior rulings and statements, also said he might allow Microsoft to collect new evidence of documents pertaining to the AOL-Netscape merger. Jackson still could rule in favor of the government's claim that Microsoft violated antitrust law, but the merger could lessen a court remedy. David Boies, the Justice Department's trial counsel, noted the possibility of some statutory issues that would maintain the secrecy of merger documents under review. Microsoft hailed Jackson's remarks as proof that the software giant did not destroy Netscape's Internet browser.

Author: Wilke, John R., Perine, Keith
Publisher: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wall Street Journal Western Edition
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0193-2241
Year: 1998
Prepackaged software, Legal issues & crime, Computer software industry, Software industry, Company legal issue, Cases, Mergers, acquisitions and divestments, Company acquisition/merger, America Online Inc., AOL, Antitrust law, MSFT, Internet access software, Web browser, Web browsers, Netscape Communications Corp., NSCP, Antitrust issue, Litigation, Lawsuit/litigation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Judge refuses to dismiss charges in Microsoft case

Article Abstract:

A US District Court judge in Washington, DC has turned down a request to dismiss most of the antitrust charges that have been arrayed against Microsoft Corp. Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's ruling could mean that he will allow potentially negative evidence to be used in the antitrust case against the software giant. Microsoft has been attempting to prevent the evidence from being used in court.

Comment:

US District Court judge turns down a request to dismiss most of the antitrust charges against Microsoft

Publisher: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wall Street Journal Western Edition
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0193-2241
Year: 1998
Computer Software, Software Publishers, Government regulation (cont), Company Planning/Goals, Legal/Government Regulation, Software, Article

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: United States, Microsoft Corp.
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Microsoft seeks 'flame mail' at Netscape. Microsoft asks judge to bar new charges. U.S. may add charges to Microsoft case: continuing investigation could pick up states' allegation on pricing
  • Abstracts: McDonald's burger war salvo; is 'made for you' the way folks want to have it? Ex-chief's plan for Sunbeam is scrapped
  • Abstracts: Anheuser-Busch, after its best sales year ever, is spending a record sum on this year's Super Bowl. Take two direct sales pitches for prescription drugs and call you pollster in the morning
  • Abstracts: Air Hog and Zoob upstage Barbie in toy parade. Radio stations make waves on the Web
  • Abstracts: Tellabs is said to be near new deal for Ciena. BankAmerica president says he will quit; Nationsbank merger leads to culture clash
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.