Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

Single and multiple period decision models for analysis of quality and quantity of validation

Article Abstract:

A study was conducted to evaluate single and multiple period models and their impact on the quality of the validation effort. The study, which assumes that validation is a critical point process, extends the single period model to allow for an uncertainty factor. Two multiperiod models are also analyzed. Results show that the validation effort's quality exhibits a vital impact. In addition, multiperiod models form critical points different from their single period counterparts.

Author: O'Leary, Daniel E.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Decision Sciences
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0011-7315
Year: 1992
Decision-making, Models, Decision making, Usage

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


A model-based approach to investigate performance improvements in rule-based expert systems

Article Abstract:

An explicit control approach that allows a knowledge engineer to test the performance of a rule-based system using prior knowledge on the rule execution frequencies is presented. First, the rules that are invoked most frequently are determined, then the order in which the rules are to be evaluated is specified, thereby minimizing the unsuccessful rule executions. Lastly, a configurator expert system is used to demonstrate the feasibility of this model-based approach.

Author: Gulati, D., Tanniru, Mohan R.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Decision Sciences
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0011-7315
Year: 1993
Rule-based systems, Rule based systems

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Determining differences in expert judgment: implications for knowledge acquisition and validation

Article Abstract:

A means of determining expert judgement incompatibility is presented. In knowledge acquisition in expert systems, the judgement of multiple experts may be aggregated to develop a single system but development of an average is not meaningful if the experts do not have similar world views. The statistical approaches of one-on-one comparison of similarity of pairs and comparison of different, a priori, groups of experts are considered.

Author: O'Leary, Daniel E.
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: Decision Sciences
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0011-7315
Year: 1993
Knowledge acquisition (Expert systems)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Expert systems, Research, Decision support systems
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Risk, return, and utility. The value of pre-decision side bets for utility maximizers
  • Abstracts: The magnitude of errors in proximal multiattribute decision analysis with probabilistically dependent attributes
  • Abstracts: FCC sets aside portion of airwaves for wireless communications services. Short circuit: McGraw-Hill's push into electronic data fails to bolster profit; critics contend the publisher suffers from nepotism and weak acquisitions; the ruffling of the managers
  • Abstracts: Measuring the impact of a delay buffer on quality costs with an unreliable production process. An inventory model of immediate and delayed delivery
  • Abstracts: Retailing and channel considerations in developing countries: a review and research propositions. Advertising standardization in multinational corporations: the subsidiary perspective
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.