Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

The application of ranking probability models to racetrack betting

Article Abstract:

The betting system developed by Hausch et. al. (1981) calculates the probabilities of winning by public's win bet fractions and forecasts ranking probabilities using the Harville (1977) model. This approach, known as the HZR system, has been proven to generate positive profits at several racetracks in the US and Canada. A discount model is presented that modifies the HZR system to improve the approximation of ranking probabilities. This model is applied to the HZR system using data sets from the Meadowlands and Atlantic City in New Jersey, Hong Kong and Japan. Results suggest that the use of the discount model with appropriate r in the HZR system results in better estimates of ranking probabilities and available profit.

Author: Busche, Kelly, Lo, Victor S.Y., Bacon-Shone, John
Publisher: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Publication Name: Management Science
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0025-1909
Year: 1995
Gambling systems, Horse race betting

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Renting ideas

Article Abstract:

Owners of ideas maximize their income by combining fees and royalties, and royalties are used more often in exclusive licenses than nonexclusive licenses. A combination of fees and royalties increases complexity, but it does not increase revenue. The use of royalties can be explained by viewing royalty pricing as an efficient tax that maximizes the joint value of a group of customers. Royalty pricing can also be viewed as a performance bond that penalizes the owner for selling ideas. Rental income is reduced if the owner fails to perform.

Author: Hall, Christopher D.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: The Journal of Business
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0021-9398
Year: 1991
Analysis, Royalties, Royalties (Intellectual property), Economic rent, Exclusive licenses

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


An exception to the risk preference anomaly

Article Abstract:

Risk aversion is implied by the theory of risk-bearing. This implication has usually been rejected in favor of 'risk-loving' behavior in previous studies of horse race betting. Data from Hong Kong horse track wagers are examined using the techniques from these previous studies, but a somewhat different result is found. Bettors in Hong Kong seem to be either risk neutral or risk averse. A comparison of Hong Kong and North American horse race betting shows a much higher volume of betting per race in Hong Kong.

Author: Busche, Kelly, Hall, Christopher D.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: The Journal of Business
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0021-9398
Year: 1988
Risk assessment, Gambling, Risk-taking (Psychology), Risk taking

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Transforming an organization: using models to foster a strategic conversation. Adaptive latitude: environment, organization, and individual influences
  • Abstracts: Application of sequential testing to motor vehicle emission certification. Application of Sequential Testing to Motor Vehicle Emission Certification
  • Abstracts: Evaluation of aggregate and individual forecast method selection rules. Diffusion and advertising: the German telephone campaign
  • Abstracts: Efficient market adjustment of odds prices to reflect track biases. Estimation uncertainty and optimal advertising decisions
  • Abstracts: An application of copulas to accident precursor analysis. Final-offer arbitration. Economic contests with incomplete information and optimal contest design
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.