Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

The information content of FAS 33 returns on equity

Article Abstract:

Data from 1980, 1981 and 1982 are used to analyze and compare returns on equity accounted for using historical cost methods and these same returns accounted for using the methodology prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Statement No. 33. Constant dollar, net holding and current cost return calculations are also analyzed, and shown to have little relation to actual security valuation changes. Historical cost accounting methods are shown to increase the corporation's purchasing power, although they do not enable the corporation to understand changes in the cost of returns on equity as well as other accounting methods.

Author: Murdoch, Brock
Publisher: American Accounting Association
Publication Name: Accounting Review
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0001-4826
Year: 1986
Investments

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Additional considerations when using the FASB data bank of changing price information

Article Abstract:

Errors contained within the computer data base compiled by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) with regard to data collection techniques used to disclose FASB 33 price information are analyzed and compared to similar errors existing on the Compustat and Value Line data bases. Most errors discussed involve data base users' failure to distinguish between historical cost disclosures and current cost disclosures in corporations' annual reports as summarized on the data bases. Errors and error rates are identified for 171 corporations' income reporting and depreciation disclosures for the period from 1979 to 1982.

Author: Thomas, Lynn R., Swanson, Edward P.
Publisher: American Accounting Association
Publication Name: Accounting Review
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0001-4826
Year: 1986
Methods, Pricing, Depreciation, Cost accounting

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


An examination of the market reactions associated with SFAS No. 8 and SFAS No. 52

Article Abstract:

The issue of market price reaction to the issuance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) numbers 8 and 52 is re-examined, using standardized abnormal returns. Accounting methods employed before SFAS No. 8 may be related to the costs it imposed, so the method is determined and its effect on observed market reactions investigated. An overall negative reaction to SFAS No. 8 is shown, and a positive response to SFAS No. 52 is shown. The pre-SFAS No. 8 method of accounting for foreign currency translation is shown to be tied in mixed and unpredictable ways to market reactions to SFAS No. 8 and SFAS No. 52.

Author: Ziebart, David A., Kim, David H.
Publisher: American Accounting Association
Publication Name: Accounting Review
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0001-4826
Year: 1987
Foreign exchange

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Standards, Accounting and auditing, Accounting, Financial Accounting Standards Board
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Effects of information sequence and irrelevant distractor information when using a computer-based decision aid
  • Abstracts: The content of the psychological contract. The career attitudes and intentions of managers in the finance sector
  • Abstracts: Human nature, organizations, and management theory. Properties of emerging organizations. Three roles of language in motivation theory
  • Abstracts: Organization-client transactions and organizational governance structures. Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers' adjustments to organizations
  • Abstracts: Ethics: ethical dilemmas in management accounting. Standards of ethical conduct for management accountants. Ethics: enforcing the NAA standards of ethical conduct
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.