Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business, general

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business, general

F.T.C. surfs the Web and gears up to demand privacy protection

Article Abstract:

The FTC is poised to emphasize formal regulation of Internet privacy. This position would contrast with the Clinton Administration's self-regulation policy since 1997. A key shift began in Jun 1998, when the FTC published a survey on the approximately 1,400 Web sites that its attorneys had monitored in spring 1998. Visitors supplied personal information to more than 90% of the Web sites, but only 14% of them showed how they would use the information. The agency will give the industry a few more months to show improvement, according to several senior FTC officials. Industry failure to demonstrate proof would compel the FTC to seek Congressional passage of an FTC-drafted bill that demands clear Internet privacy standards. The FTC is an independent agency that does not require permission from the Clinton Administration.

Author: Brinkley, Joel
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1998
Telecommunications regulations, Privacy issue, Privacy, United States. Federal Trade Commission, Government communications regulation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


It may be boilerplate, but read before you click

Article Abstract:

There are questions about whether Web users are signing a legally binding contract when they click on the 'I agree' or 'I accept' button at the end of pages that contain complex legal language in small types. Many impatient users bind themselves to these 'click through' or 'shrink wrap' agreements in their haste to install a new computer game. The legal community likens the 'contracts of adhesion' to video store policies, rental car forms and airline tickets. Scholars generally say these shrink-wrap agreements can constitute contracts unless the provisions are unreasonable, but the buyer's inability to negotiate the terms makes it difficult to enforce in court. Most of the shrink-wrap agreements contain language designed to protect the company from a potential customer suit.

Author: Hafner, Katie
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1998
Industry legal issue, Web site/Web page development

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Internet, Internet services
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Three newbies provide a primer for the Internet. A posting on Internet is ruled to be illegal
  • Abstracts: Differences over privacy on the Internet; U.S. and Europe at odds on how to protect users. Network problem disrupts Internet; chaos prevails for hours after lapse by systems worker
  • Abstracts: Santa brought many gizmos for the Internet. Texas Instruments is ready to launch 2 new notebook computers next week
  • Abstracts: Microsoft plans new bid for Internet control. Harm found to the image of Microsoft: survey sees decline in brand reputation
  • Abstracts: Compaq rethinks PC design to launch the basic $999 model. Now you can watch another new TV show, but it's no sitcom
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.