The self-preservation section that goes with the cash flow
Article Abstract:
The provision in section 111 of the HGCRA is analyzed by assessing the Court of Appeal's judgment in case of Rupert Morgan Building Services V Jervis. According to court, section 111 is only a provision about cash flow, and it does not make any payment, whether due under an interim certificate, final certificate, or any other mechanism, irrevocably due.
Publication Name: Architects' Journal
Subject: Business, international
ISSN: 0003-8466
Year: 2004
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Time is key, as inspectors face the fallout of failing to notice
Article Abstract:
A case between Butler and Young v. Bedford Borough Council dated May 20, 2004 is detailed wherein the question that when is an initial notice not an initial notice is raised. It was concluded that the notice is an initial notice only when it is served before the work has been started.
Publication Name: Architects' Journal
Subject: Business, international
ISSN: 0003-8466
Year: 2004
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Microsoft settles antitrust suits: resolution of state cases helps software firm put bulk of issues behind it
- Abstracts: At the RIBA's roots lies the key to a solid foundation. No time to ignore the small print. A question of cost
- Abstracts: Fight moves on to restore diploma. Institutionalised free time has left us all feeling bored
- Abstracts: Lost in the matrix. New practices need the established ones, and the established need the new. Closed encounters
- Abstracts: Construction futures. Fortune telling