Why the EU arms embargo should stay

Article Abstract:

In 1989, the European Union imposed an arms embargo against China to express its displeasure with the then ruling Chinese regime for brutality on peaceful demonstration at Tiananmen Square. There is a vested interest amongst certain EU countries suggesting the removal of the ban. The reasons why such embargo should not be removed are presented.

Europe, Foreign trade, International politics, International trade, European Union, Military policy, Control, Tiananmen Square Incident, 1989, Arms transfers

---

Time to fix China's arbitration

Article Abstract:

An analysis is done on the regulations of China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission that delivers verdicts for foreign companies embroiled in business disputes with local partners or counterparts.

Legal issues & crime, Government regulation (cont), Government regulation, International economic relations, Legal/Government Regulation, Laws, regulations and rules, Commercial arbitration, Legislative bodies, Legislative committees

---

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Health check for hospitals. A firm footing for good vibrations
• Abstracts: How Parmalat spent and spent. Milan officials are expanding Parmalat probe. Italy may widen Parmalat inquiry
• Abstracts: How a lifted embargo would help China. Keep the arms embargo on China. Beijing's tough Korea call
• Abstracts: Closed areas plan 'threat to fleets'. Philippines appeals over EU tuna exports. Vietnam rising
• Abstracts: After the victory, can Koizumi deliver? Better shape up: Basel II signals change for Asian banks

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.