Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

Accounting policy changes: the tax consequences

Article Abstract:

When a company considers changing its accounting methods, it often does not consider the tax consequences, but this should be an important factor in the decision. Court cases, such as Usher's Wiltshire Brewery Ltd. v Bruce and Odeon Associated Theatres Ltd. vs. Jones, show the court's requirements on proper accounting methods. In the Statement of Standard Accounting Principles (SSAP) circumstances when prior year adjustments should be made due to a change of method are: (1) where accounting policy has been changed; (2) when there has been a major error in the previous year's accounts. SSAP 6 states that the accounting method used should not be changed unless it can be proven that the new method is in fact superior and gives a fairer, more accurate picture of the company's finances.

Author: Sherry, Michael
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1986
Methods, Accounting

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Where will the line be drawn?

Article Abstract:

The distinction between business plans that have no other purpose but to avoid taxes, and legitimate business plans that are structured to minimize taxes has been blurred by recent UK court cases. Tax avoidance is now defined as a pre-ordained series of transactions that may or may not involve the achievement of a legitimate business end, into which are inserted steps that have no commercial purpose apart from the avoidance of tax liability. It is possible that this interpretation may be further broadened in future court cases.

Author: Sherry, Michael
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1988
Laws, regulations and rules, Tax evasion

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


PAYE the employers dilemma

Article Abstract:

Guidelines for determining when an employee is or is not an employee for tax purposes are discussed. The auditor's primary concern should be to ensure that the client operates the British payroll tax (PAYE) correctly for all employees. The Institute of Chartered Accountants offers a training video designed to help auditors determine if a client's workers are employees or independent contractors. The Inland Revenue has also issued a booklet for determining workers' status under PAYE.

Author: Sherry, Michael
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1987
Taxation, Tax accounting, Self-employed persons, Self employed persons, Withholding tax

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Interpretation and construction, Tax law, United Kingdom, Tax policy, Great Britain
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Shaping and coloring the public message. Portable power sales curve. The big mower safety story: it's in the dealers' hands
  • Abstracts: Fair chance for consumers. Dealing with insolvent partnerships. Consumer protection
  • Abstracts: Turning the tide of urban decay. Urban renewal: first steps down a long road. Rates: are they outmoded?
  • Abstracts: Structure and agency in an institutionalized setting: the application and social transformation of control in the Big Six
  • Abstracts: Interest rate management: advanced techniques. Managing foreign exchange: a balance of variables. Managing foreign exchange: translation risk
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.