Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

An estimation of consumer benefits from the public campaign to lower cereal prices

Article Abstract:

Millions of cereal foods consumers greatly benefitted from the jawboning campaign of two Congressmen against the overpricing activities of cereal companies. Market researches done by the Information Resources Inc. indicate the steady decline of cereal prices after the 1995 public campaign against overpriced cereals. Increases in private label prices and decreases in the branded label prices narrowed the gap between the two. Price cuts reduced brand price cost margins thereby decreasing the demand for branded label advertising.

Author: Cotterill, Ronald W., Franklin, Andrew W.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Agribusiness
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0742-4477
Year: 1999
Economic aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Jawboning cereal: the campaign to lower cereal prices

Article Abstract:

Jawboning is a technique used by government officials and legislators to force private corporations to make adjustments when prices reach questionable levels. The ready-to-eat cereal industry in the US was forced to lower prices when a group of legislators studied cereal price statistics and revealed to the public the overpricing and monopolizing activities of branded cereal companies. Post cereals was the first company to admit to overpricing. Several companies followed suit as a result of a successful jawboning campaign.

Author: Cotterill, Ronald W.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Agribusiness
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0742-4477
Year: 1999
Administration of General Economic Programs, Wage & Price Stabilization, Analysis

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


High cereal prices and the prospects for relief by expansion of private label and antitrust enforcement

Article Abstract:

Cereal meals do not necessarily provide good value to consumers since the actual cost of cereals are higher than steak and eggs. Processing these foods are not as expensive as canned foods, and thus, have very marginal production costs. Promotional campaigns, such as those in cut-out coupons provide consumers with a false sense of value. The erroneous statistics used by cereal companies in the anti-trust lawsuit as charged by the State of New York, gives consumers a wrong impression of actual food price index.

Author: Cotterill, Ronald W.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Agribusiness
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0742-4477
Year: 1999
Cases, Statistics, Price control, Price regulations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Prices and rates, Cereal products industry, Breakfast cereals, Cereal products, Grain products, Wage price policy, Wage-price policy
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Sorting the winners from the wide boys. Where to look for independent advice. Sound out advice
  • Abstracts: A reexamination of the conglomerate merger wave in the 1960s: an internal capital markets view. Tobin's Q and the gains from takeovers
  • Abstracts: Forging a long-term PR relationship; companies discover benefits in establishing successful partnerships. Businesses take out Web insurance
  • Abstracts: Web marketers wrestle with content control: companies starting to implement site posting strategies. c2o's mission: EDS' Web shop aims to merge fragmented online commerce solutions
  • Abstracts: Disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options: tax benefits versus financial reporting costs. The influence of risk diversification on the early exercise of employee stock options by executive officers
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.