Are some mutual fund managers better than others? Cross-sectional patterns in behavior and performance

Article Abstract:

We examine whether mutual fund performance is related to characteristics of fund managers that may indicate ability, knowledge, or effort. In particular, we study the relationship between performance and the manager's age, the average composite SAT score at the manager's undergraduate institution, and whether the manager has an MBA. Although the raw data suggest striking return differences between managers with different characteristics, most of these can be explained by behavioral differences between managers and by selection biases. After adjusting for these, some performance differences remain. In particular, managers who attended higher-SAT undergraduate institutions have systematically higher risk-adjusted excess returns. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Investment Advisory Services, Financial planners

---

Of tournaments and temptations: an analysis of managerial incentives in the mutual fund industry

Article Abstract:

We test the hypothesis that when their compensation is linked to relative performance, managers of investment portfolios likely to end up as "losers" will manipulate fund risk differently than those managing portfolios likely to be "winners." An empirical investigation of the performance of 334 growth-oriented mutual funds during 1876 to 1991 demonstrates that mid-year losers tend to increase fund volatility in the latter part of an annual assessment period to a greater extent than mid-year winners. Furthermore, we show that this effect became stronger as industry growth and investor awareness of fund performance increased over time. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Other Financial Vehicles, Investment offices, not elsewhere classified, Mutual Funds (Closed End), Securities Investment Advice, Risk management, Closed end mutual funds

---

Preferences for stock characteristics as revealed by mutual fund portfolio holdings

Article Abstract:

This investigation of the cross-section of mutual fund equity holdings for the years 1991 and 1992 shows that mutual funds have a significant preference towards stocks with high visibility and low transaction costs, and are averse to stocks with low idiosyncratic volatility. These findings are relevant to theories concerning investor recognition, a potential agency problem in mutual funds, tests of trend-following and herd behavior by mutual funds, and corporate finance. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Property is stronger than ever. Renovation brings its own rewards. Will too many parks spoil the broth?
• Abstracts: An asymptotic theory for estimating beta-pricing models using cross-sectional regression. Economic significance of predictable variations in stock index returns

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.