Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

Corporate governance - who needs it?

Article Abstract:

Effective corporate governance of listed companies could be enhanced by the presence of both independent auditors and non-executive directors on these companies' boards. Independent auditors can provide the requisite objectivity needed to protect the interests of investors. They are also in an excellent position to detect possible fraud. Appropriately experienced non-executive directors, on the other hand, can provide a powerful incentive to create internal committees that can check excessive executive remuneration. They can also provide valuable support to independent auditors.

Author: Butler, Jim
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1991
Laws, regulations and rules, Auditing, Practice, Business ethics, Industry self-regulation, Industry self regulation, Auditors

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Valuing the non-executive on a going concern basis

Article Abstract:

Non-executive directors can bring in an independent yet informed views to companies. They are especially valuable to small, closely held corporations whose boards are dominated by a few individuals who are often limited in all-around management skills. The non-executive, independent directors can balance the views of an entire board, hence ensuring that shareholders' interests are justly considered. They can further act as coordinators and catalysts for major changes within a company.

Author: Scott, Gordon
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1989
Small business, Executives

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Action on entrenchment

Article Abstract:

Research has revealed that the Cadbury Committee board structure reforms, which aimed to reduce managerial entrenchment in non-performing companies, have had some effect, however, managers are still protected from removal.

Author: Dedman, Elisabeth
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 2001
Appointments, resignations and dismissals, Chief executive officers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Management, Corporate directors
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Corporate risk management and the incentive effects of debt. Leverage
  • Abstracts: Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. A multinational perspective on capital structure choice and internal capital markets
  • Abstracts: Going public without governance: managerial reputation effects. Executive option repricing, incentives, and retention
  • Abstracts: Superfund liabilities and governmental reporting entities: an empirical analysis. Restructuring and firm value: The effects of profitability and restructuring purpose
  • Abstracts: Jitona decreased its proceeds, it expects growth in 2001. Leciva saw a profit and increased its proceeds
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.