Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

Door to refund closed when claim filed late

Article Abstract:

Some courts, including the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, have considered allowing equitable tolling of the statute of limitations for tax refund claims, but the US Supreme Court's ruling in Brockamp closed the door on such claims. The Court interpreted IRC section 6511 strictly, finding that Congress did not intend for there to be any exceptions to the statute of limitations. Brockamp involved two refund claims where mentally incompetent taxpayers overpaid their taxes.

Author: Bornstein, Maureen
Publisher: CCH, Inc.
Publication Name: Taxes: The Tax Magazine
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0040-0181
Year: 1997
Public Finance Activities, Tax Administration, Laws, regulations and rules, Equitable remedies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Does a late return shorten the time for claiming a refund?

Article Abstract:

The commonly accepted interpretation of the tax refund statute of limitations has been questioned by various rulings since mid-1993. Some courts have held that filing a late return shortens the time allowed for filing a refund claim while others have supported the conventional position that the limitations period disregards circumstances. The confusion surrounds the application of IRC sections 6511(a) and 6512(b)(3) and the US Supreme Court will have to resolve the issue.

Author: Stein, Ronald A.
Publisher: CCH, Inc.
Publication Name: Taxes: The Tax Magazine
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0040-0181
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Will the exclusionary rule become extinct in civil tax cases?

Article Abstract:

The coverage of the Fourth Amendment's exclusionary rule has been declining since the 1970s. The purpose of this rule is to deter future misconduct by the police, but this purpose does not seem to be attained in practice. The Tax Court, in Jones v. Commissioner, held that the Internal Revenue Service can use evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment against taxpayers in civil tax cases.

Author: Stein, Ronald A.
Publisher: CCH, Inc.
Publication Name: Taxes: The Tax Magazine
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0040-0181
Year: 1992
Searches and seizures, Exclusionary rule (Evidence), Exclusionary rule

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Tax refunds, Limitation of actions (Taxation), Statute of limitations (Taxation), Tax appeals
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Lottery winning installments are separate gains. Purchase options can turn leases into taxable sales
  • Abstracts: How to decipher the insiders' code. Peace of mind at a price
  • Abstracts: Gradus finds life an uphill struggle. Still room for improvement. Tomkinsons: bleak outlook(performance of Tomkinsons assessed)
  • Abstracts: Northern lights under bushels. TIA inertia. Stamping out the charity cowboys
  • Abstracts: Inputting data is no longer a chore: investment software is pretty much useless without data.To save the investor inputting hundreds of prices every day, a range of automated systems havebeen developed. The more reliable they are, the more they cost
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.