Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

Hunter: QDR wrongly puts costs first, ahead of threats, needs

Article Abstract:

The Chairman of the US House Armed Services Committee (HASC), Rep. Duncan Hunter expressed concern regarding the Quadrennial Defense Review, in which the Department of Defense (DOD) tailored acquisitions to the finances available rather than deciding what was required and then finding the finances to fund them. A defense analysts claims that QDR proposed reducing defense spending toward the end of 2010, partly through restraints on personnel spending, even though better benefits have not prevented a decline in the quality of recruits.

Author: Ahearn, Dave
Publisher: King Publishing Group
Publication Name: Defense Today
Subject: Business
ISSN:
Year: 2006
Facilities & equipment, Equipment and supplies, United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services, Hunter, Duncan L., Quadrennial Defense Review

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Analysis: Procurement reform aims to provide more complex, joint systems

Article Abstract:

The defense procurement reform panel which assessed the defense procurements at the first meeting of the Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment Project (DARPA) revealed that a broad view of procurement was needed, that would avoid duplication of capabilities in a budget-constrained environment. Some DAPA goals were outlined, the most important being controlling schedule and cost, and ensuring that whatever the Pentagon procured, worked and passed operational tests.

Author: Ahearn, Dave
Publisher: King Publishing Group
Publication Name: Defense Today
Subject: Business
ISSN:
Year: 2005
Reports, United States. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


DOD leader backs purchases of systems from abroad

Article Abstract:

A senior Department of Defense (DOD) official and the deputy undersecretary of defense for industrial policy, Suzanne Patrick, stated that the Pentagon has no obligation to purchase wares from American companies. She stated that the DOD obligation is to provide the best equipment and platforms to warfighter, not necessarily from the US industrial base.

Author: Ahearn, Dave
Publisher: King Publishing Group
Publication Name: Defense Today
Subject: Business
ISSN:
Year: 2005
Patrick, Suzanne

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Evaluation, Officials and employees, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Military procurement, United States. Department of Defense, Defence buying
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Pace says QDR shows major weapons systems still required: Both new and old threats loom. General opposes leasing any more ships made overseas
  • Abstracts: Yong: Navy needs both DD(X) for major threat, LCS for terrorism. LCS to play major role as unmanned vehicles tackle mined waters
  • Abstracts: McCain proposes procurement study, possible reform. Senators file bill to halt current BRAC process. Lawmakers reject curb on arms to China: Manufacturers laud death of China arms-sale bill
  • Abstracts: Lockheed Martin proves satellite can take the shake. Despite rumblings, F/A-22 raptor moves forward. Pentagon 'JCIDS' process blesses UAVs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.