Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Business

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Business

The use of property does not bar gain nonrecognition

Article Abstract:

The required recognition of gain realized on the exchange of home offices, owner-occupied apartment buildings, working farms with farmhouses, or other types of dual-use property can be deferred under Sections 1031 and 1034. The first section allows deferment of gain or loss recognition when property used for a trade or business or for investment is exchanged for property used similarly. The second section requires that the gain arising from the sale or exchange of the taxpayer's principal residence be rolled over into the latest new principal residential property that was acquired and lived in taxpayer for the duration of the four-year replacement period. Taxpayers can use Secs. 1031 and 1034 concurrently or in succession to delay gain recognition.

Author: Riggall, Kneave
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Taxation for Accountants
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1995
Real property exchanges, Like-kind exchanges

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Nonrecognition denied for exchange with mother

Article Abstract:

The IRS has ruled that a nonrecognition treatment of an exchange of investment property made between relatives is a violation of Section 1031's related-party provisions even if the transaction was conducted through a qualified intermediary. In TAM 9748006, a taxpayer made a four-party exchange of property involving himself, his mother, a third party and an intermediary. The transactions resulted to the taxpayer's acquisition of an investment property. The third party ended up with an unimproved property while the taxpayer's mother, the original owner of the investment property, ended up with cash. IRS held that the exchange was designed to avoid the related-party provisions of the Tax Code.

Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Taxation for Accountants
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1998
Cases, United States. Internal Revenue Service, Related party transactions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Prop. regs. ease meeting reorganization continuity rules

Article Abstract:

The authors discuss favorable IRS proposed regulations under IRC 368 which provide rules concerning continuity of shareholder interest and continuity of business enterprise for purposes of obtaining tax-free treatment of corporate reorganizations. The application of the regulations to post-transaction events is the focus of the article.

Author: Mandel, Gary B.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Taxation for Accountants
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0040-0165
Year: 1997
United States, Corporate reorganizations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Taxation, Tax law, Laws, regulations and rules, Recognition of gain or loss (Taxation), Recognized gain or loss (Taxation)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: C-17 proves under fire, officials say. Wynne denies DOD need for new management post. Wynne cities $3 billion in contracts Druyun may have tainted
  • Abstracts: The impact of interstate banking legislation on target and buyer bank stock returns. Evidence of market overreaction to state antitakeover legislation
  • Abstracts: The global perspective. The right mix. To set the house in order
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.