Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Construction and materials industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Construction and materials industries

Judge sets deadline for cash discount

Article Abstract:

In a UK building contract case, Team Services versus Kier Management and Design one of the main points was the meaning of 'cash discount'. The subcontractor Team had submitted a tender for nearly 15 million pounds sterling to Kier the management contractor which included a 2.5% cash discount. Kier argued that the discount should be allowed as a date had not been stipulated whereas Team stated that a discount could only be made if payment was made on time. The judge held that Kier was not entitled to the 2.5% cash discount and that discount did not have to be tied to a date.

Author: Lloyd, Humphrey
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1992
Kier Management and Design, Team Services

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Judgement ways

Article Abstract:

The popularity of arbitration as opposed to litigation is increasing in the UK construction industry because most building contracts request arbitration. Arbitration may be more expensive than litigation because costs for the arbitrator, judge and court room are expensive whereas in litigation they are free. In litigation a definite date is given and the system has more impact. Arbitration only works if the dispute is capable of negotiation and because parties want a settlement; it is not suitable if the defendant is suing more than one party.

Author: Chevin, Denise, Lloyd, Humphrey
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1992
Arbitration (Administrative law), Administrative arbitration, Costs (Law), Legal fees

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Law lords champion arbitration remit

Article Abstract:

The UK House of Lords' rejected Eurotunnel's appeal against contractor TML on Jan 21 1993. TML threatened to discontinue work unless Eurotunnel paid for a variation order made in 1987. Eurotunnel appealed to the High Court to prevent TML's threat. The Eurotunnel contract incorporates internationaal trade laws. The House of Lords decision to reject Eurotunnel's appeal shows that a company who wishes to avoid arbitration procedures by using the courts will be refused.

Author: Lloyd, Humphrey
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1993
Engineering services, Eurotunnel PLC, TML/Stern Engineers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Construction industry, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The exhibitors demand relief. Fort Lauderdale exhibitors defy bad economy. Brunswick gets a thumbs up from analysts
  • Abstracts: Disputing contract terms. Arbitration rules OK. Opening up the decision process
  • Abstracts: Peace process. Finding fault. part 2
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.