Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Construction and materials industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Construction and materials industries

Ready, set-off, go!

Article Abstract:

There are very mixed views within the UK construction industry about the exact interpretation of set-off clauses in contracts. This was seen in the case of Mellowes Archital v Bell Projects, where Bell, the main contractor, withheld payment from Mellowes in apparent contravention of the set-off clauses in their contract. Bell argued that loss and expense due to delay should not be interpreted as coming within set-off regulations. In general, a claim for damages for delay is a set-off, and the main contractor can only withhold payment if the subcontract rules are followed.

Author: Bingham, Tony
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1997
Set-off and counterclaim, Counterclaims

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Sweeping statements

Article Abstract:

The bad practices of some construction industry lawyers can reek havoc on the completion of building projects. Poor lawyers may persuade clients to accept inadequate and substandard contracts, which fail to take into account security for the customer and contractors. Construction industry lawyers have a duty to provide clients with the best possible legal advice which prevents the threat of financial insecurity should problems occur during the construction period.

Author: Bingham, Tony
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1999
Practice, Practice of law, Attorney and client

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Shaky ground

Article Abstract:

Contractors and architects should work together to discover flaws in project work, otherwise legal expenses could be costly if legal liability is found. Either party may find it necessary to point out limitations with work carried out during a project, although there is no legislation which makes it a contractural obligation. The courts require common sense to prevail in cases where an obvious flaw is spotted by either the contractor or designer.

Author: Bingham, Tony
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1999
Liability (Law), Legal liability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Construction industry, Laws, regulations and rules, Column
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Merger targets off bid lists. Underground rules. Gummer steps up drive towards quality
  • Abstracts: A smart place to live. Social revolution. Breathing space: the low-allergen house shown at the Ideal Home Exhibition wasa breath of fresh air for many
  • Abstracts: Cover yourself in glory. Stretching design and build. Is the contract guaranteed?
  • Abstracts: We have to sell them. Guiding prospects to a purchase decision. An educated consumer is your best customer
  • Abstracts: Bypass operation. Lawyers' love letters. Cause for thought
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.