Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Construction and materials industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Construction and materials industries

Transferring responsibility

Article Abstract:

A recent ruling by the European Court of Justice calls into question the employment protection which the Acquired Rights Directive and the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) regulations have widely been interpreted as guaranteeing. The ruling states that the directive will only apply to the transfer of a service contract if substantial tangible or intangible assets are transferred from one company to another. This ruling may mean that contractors which have taken on an existing workforce may face high costs for severance and redundancy payments.

Author: Goodwyn, Edward
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1997
Interpretation and construction, Labor law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Employment agreements

Article Abstract:

Construction employers have to be aware of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) regulation 1981 (TUPE) and its effects when tendering for new works. It may mean that they inherit employees and they need to price their tender bids accordingly. Often new employers assimilate transferred employees into an existing workforce, matching terms and conditions. However a recent case will mean that employers will not be able to agree the rationalisation of inherited employees' contracts.

Author: Goodwyn, Edward
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Studying the form. (potentially hazardous subcontracts)

Article Abstract:

Norwest Holst's subcontract contains potential hazards following amendment and addition to the standard Conditions of Domestic Subcontract DOM/1. The reasonable balance and fairness of the standard DOM/1 is distorted and the subcontractor faces uncertainties about the timing and amount of payments and there are some onerous clauses.

Author: Huxtable, John
Publisher: Builder Group plc
Publication Name: Building
Subject: Construction and materials industries
ISSN: 0007-3318
Year: 1996
Building, Developing, and General Contracting, Contract Construction, Construction industry, Construction contracts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Contractors
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Taking care of business: the former brewer who is to be the HSE's new head of construction safety. Sprint finish to the top of the world
  • Abstracts: Walking on glass. Surfing for success
  • Abstracts: Resources help retailers go for the gold. How innovation can lead to business success. MHI voices objections to HUD wind standards
  • Abstracts: Going private. Bursting the straitjacket. The feel-better factor
  • Abstracts: Open-door policy. You can take it with you. Being there
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.