Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Economics

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Economics

Employee versus conventionally-owned and controlled firms: an experimental analysis

Article Abstract:

A study was conducted to characterize experimental techniques to evaluate hypotheses about the influence of employee ownership on economic, social, and psychological outcomes. Results showed that participants in employee-owned companies had higher productivity and a better perception on the fairness in the pay they received. The subjects also supported higher levels of involvement in their job responsibilities. In addition the participants had a greater drive to help their colleagues that those in conventionally-owned firms.

Author: Frohlich, Norman, Starke, Frederick A., Godard, John, Oppenheimer, Joe A.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Managerial & Decision Economics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0143-6570
Year: 1998
Psychological aspects, Research, Employee ownership, Job satisfaction, Industrial productivity, Workers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Negligence versus strict liability in a principal-agent model

Article Abstract:

Moral hazard problems may arise in liability cases when an employer has not observed an employee do hazardous work that has injured a third party. This has implications for the due care standards that may apply in the employer's case. In a principal-agent model, it is revealed that the choice of liability rules affects the motivation of the employee to use caution. Under strict liability rules, the employee is seen to be less careful. The negligence liability rule can be enforced by inclusion in a employees's contract.

Author: Newman, Harry A., Wright, David W.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Journal of Economics and Business
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0148-6195
Year: 1992
Regulation misc. commercial sectors, Analysis, Laws, regulations and rules, Employer liability, Negligence, Hazardous occupations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Dubai: carrier liability

Article Abstract:

The Dubai Court of Cassation has reversed a decision made by the Court of Appeal which dismisses a case of a carrier who delivered damaged goods to its final destination. The carrier believes that case should be dismissed because Dubai courts have no jurisdiction to hear the case. The Court of Cassation believes that the Court of Appeal failed to consider documentation which shows that the cargo was discharged in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Publisher: International Executive Reports Ltd.
Publication Name: Middle East Executive Reports
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0271-0498
Year: 1999
Freight Transportation, Cases, Freight transportation industry, Fraud, Delivery of goods, Deliveries (Transportation)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Employer sanctions on hiring illegal labor: an experimental analysis of firm compliance. Strategic hiring to deter entry by unions
  • Abstracts: The economics of parent-subsidiary mergers: an empirical analysis. An empirical analysis of strategic competition and firm values: the case of R&D competition
  • Abstracts: Competitivity in auction markets: an experimental and theoretical investigatioin. Risk-return measures of hedging effectiveness: the case of multiple cash andfutures markets
  • Abstracts: How effective are capital controls? Hedge Funds and Currency Crises. Punishment schedules for capital flight
  • Abstracts: Europe. Credit and banking structure: Asian and African-American experience in Los Angeles
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.