Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Economics

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Economics

Equilibrium vertical foreclosure: reply

Article Abstract:

A1990 study revealed that vertical foreclosure can raise downstream prices and negatively affect unintegrated downstream competitors. Vertical integration provides the integrating company with a competitive advantage in the downstream market. The foreclosed downstream competitor does not benefit from integrating itself. The criticisms of David Reiffen in a 1992 study include that the findings are contingent on the ability of the integrated firm to establish a high upstream price, but the 1990 study shows that this is not true.

Author: Salop, Steven C., Saloner, Garth, Ordover, Janusz A.
Publisher: American Economic Association
Publication Name: American Economic Review
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0002-8282
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Exclusionary vertical restraints law: has economics mattered?

Article Abstract:

The way in which the development of antitrust analysis of exclusionary vertical relationships is affected by economics is studied. The conclusions include that the law is affected by economics, that the way in which antitrust accepts new economic concepts is subject to randomness and that courts tend to restrict their engagement with new economic theories. Industrial-organization theories in antitrust appear to have a favorable future. Economists must present their theories to the legal community in an understandable way.

Author: Salop, Steven C.
Publisher: American Economic Association
Publication Name: American Economic Review
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0002-8282
Year: 1993
Antitrust law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Equilibrium vertical foreclosure: comment

Article Abstract:

A 1990 study by Janusz A. Ordover, Garth Saloner and Steven C. Salop revealed that final product prices can increase as a result of vertical mergers and that these mergers can negatively affect welfare. The researchers admit that the postintegration pricing strategy has a dramatic effect on the results of the study. The findings are not very robust because different results are obtained when the number of upstream firms selling a homogeneous product is changed to three instead of two.

Author: Reiffen, David
Publisher: American Economic Association
Publication Name: American Economic Review
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0002-8282
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Economic aspects, Acquisitions and mergers, Pricing, Vertical integration, Equilibrium (Economics)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Caps on political lobbying. Caps on political lobbying: comment. Caps on political lobbying: reply
  • Abstracts: Who's afraid of the public debt? Optimal income taxation: an example with a U-shaped pattern of optimal marginal tax rates: comment
  • Abstracts: Saudi Aramco spearheads efforts to realize e-commerce potential. The new virtual economy: how it will affect the Arab region
  • Abstracts: Organic and ethical foods. Forecast. The future
  • Abstracts: Workfare versus welfare: incentive arguments for work requirements in poverty-alleviation programs. Modeling technology in developing countries
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.