Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Economics

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Economics

The level of optimal fines to prevent fraud when reputations exist and penalty clauses are unenforceable

Article Abstract:

The Sentencing Commission's 1991 sentencing guidelines for federal crimes committed by business organizations require fines to be computed solely on the basis of a crime's social costs. However, the greater probability of higher fines under this system does not prevent people from maintaining that the guidelines can only imposed too low a level of fines on corporate offenders. However, further study indicates that subsidizing information that leads to revelations of fraud is likely to be more efficient in deterring corporate crime than merely imposing fines.

Author: Lott, John R., Jr.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Managerial & Decision Economics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0143-6570
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Doctrine for destruction: the case of corporate criminal liability

Article Abstract:

Corporate crime caught the attention of the public with the Sentencing Commission's 1991 announcement of sentencing guidelines for federal crimes committed by business organizations. However, the public's growing interest in the topic notwithstanding, questions on the necessity of corporate criminal sentencing remain unanswered. One view posits that there is no need for corporate criminal sentencing since it rests on a faulty theory of liability that is destructive when viewed from the moral, legal or economic standpoints.

Author: Parker, Jeffrey S.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Managerial & Decision Economics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0143-6570
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The economics of corporate criminal liability

Article Abstract:

The average level of fines imposed for federal crimes committed by business organizations was substantially raised by the Sentencing Commission in 1991. Some quarters have criticized the increase as being fundamentally flawed in terms of the way they are imposed and calculated. However, with criminal fraud as an example, the heightened fines imposed under the 1991 sentencing guidelines are shown to possess a strong economic basis.

Author: Ulen, Thomas S.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Publication Name: Managerial & Decision Economics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0143-6570
Year: 1996
Economic aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Laws, regulations and rules, Ethical aspects, Fraud, Corporations, Criminal liability of juristic persons, Juristic persons criminal liability, Criminal law, United States. Sentencing Commission, Corporate corruption, Fines (Penalties)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The effects of rate regulation on demand for supplemental health insurance. Simultaneous model of innovation, secrecy, and patent policy
  • Abstracts: The sound of silence in prisoner's dilemma and dictator games. Institutions affect fairness: experimental investigation
  • Abstracts: Environmental protection: U.A.E. prepares draft law, joins treaty on climate change. New Central Bank regulations on representative offices and finance companies
  • Abstracts: The liberalisation of east-west European trade: hubs, spokes and further complications. Free-trade agreements: for better or worse?
  • Abstracts: Cost economies in EU banking systems. Cost economies and interest rate margins in a unified European banking market
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.