Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Electronics and electrical industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Electronics and electrical industries

California deregulation: at the stroke of midnight

Article Abstract:

A combination of independent system operator/power exchange (ISO/PX) was the selected vehicle for delivering electrical power to retail customers when choice becomes available on January 1, 1999. The California Public Utility Commission originally planned to phase in retail choice, then reversed that decision under pressure to introduce competition for lower electric rates. The ISO/PX structure was then determined to be a compromise and investor-owned utilities should sell their transmission assets for better market and competitive power.

Publisher: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Publication Name: Electrical World
Subject: Electronics and electrical industries
ISSN: 0013-4457
Year: 1997
Cover Story

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


California's ISO/PX nears the finish line - will it be on time?

Article Abstract:

The California Public Utilities Commission designed the independent system operator (ISO) and power exchange (PX) electric utility supply mechanism that was ordered by the state legislature. The ISO and PX would operate as two separate businesses. January 1, 1998, is the date that California consumers and electricity suppliers are scheduled to begin the participating in the new plan.

Author: Briody, L. Patrick
Publisher: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Publication Name: Electrical World
Subject: Electronics and electrical industries
ISSN: 0013-4457
Year: 1997

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Competition: what's good for the goose is good for the gander

Article Abstract:

Federal and state regulators are not yet ready to let the local electric utilities compete for retail customers. California is the largest retail utility market and is set to become competitive on January 1, 1998. It is unfair to let utilities from other states compete for California's $22 billion electricity business while California is not allowed similar action.

Author: Crystal, Jonathan A.
Publisher: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Publication Name: Electrical World
Subject: Electronics and electrical industries
ISSN: 0013-4457
Year: 1997
United States, Column

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Electric utilities, California, Deregulation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Industry heads discuss the future of mobile electronics. Attitudes from the editor & publisher
  • Abstracts: German deregulation: will it spark - or fizzle - the European Union's free market? To merge or not to merge? It is still the question for utilities
  • Abstracts: U.S. economy rebounds; electronics never dipped. A mixed first half for the electronics industry. The conversion of Sony
  • Abstracts: Real inflation is the real culprit. Trauma in capacitors. Now, a strong dollar is taking its toll
  • Abstracts: Life's getting complex: tools derived from complexity and chaos theories are helping companies like Intel gain insight into how their businesses work
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.