Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Engineering and manufacturing industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Engineering and manufacturing industries

Design/build solutions

Article Abstract:

A discussion of legal problems involved in design/build projects is presented. The basic difference of design/build from design/bid/build is that the design engineer is the contractor's ally and not of the owner. This relationship can lead to a change in the standard of care given by the building designer. The engineer is responsible only for exercising the degree of skill that the average design professional would employ. Contractors have to guarantee that the result of their services would be successful assuming that the building design is appropriate.

Author: Friedlander, Mark C.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Journal of Management in Engineering
Subject: Engineering and manufacturing industries
ISSN: 0742-597X
Year: 1998
Project management, Civil engineering

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Paid-when-paid clauses

Article Abstract:

Paid-when-paid clauses generally involve payment from the owner to the general contractor prior to the payment from the general contractor to the subcontractor. A provision which forces the subcontractor to assume the risk that the owner will fail to pay the general contractor is considered as void and unenforceable. However, in the occasion that the provision fixes a time for payment and does not suspend the subcontractor's right to payment upon failure of the owner to pay, the general contractor does not violate public policy.

Author: Lazaruk, Kenneth H.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Journal of Management in Engineering
Subject: Engineering and manufacturing industries
ISSN: 0742-597X
Year: 1996
Subcontracting, Payment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Who pays for defective design?

Article Abstract:

Routine circumstances, contract clauses or conduct may be used to determine who should be held accountable for defective building designs. Design/build contracts assume that the contractor is liable whether the problem is defective design or faulty construction. However, the building owner may be held liable if the information given to the contractor is erroneous and leads to a defective design. This situation is illustrated in the case between Pitt-Des Moines Inc and the US Navy and M A Mortensen Co against an Air Force base.

Author: Sweeney, Neal J.
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Publication Name: Journal of Management in Engineering
Subject: Engineering and manufacturing industries
ISSN: 0742-597X
Year: 1998
Analysis, Malpractice, Engineers, Liability for building accidents

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Construction industry, Laws, regulations and rules, Contractors
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A mine of information. Hollow fibers dry more effectively
  • Abstracts: Use reliability-based information to assess design alternatives. Improve plant reliability by redefining roles
  • Abstracts: Technological revolutions and the formation of strategic groups. Information systems, strategic flexibility and firm performance: An empirical investigation
  • Abstracts: Physical or virtual team collocation: does it matter? Integrated coordination in cooperative design. Tool integration for collaborative design of manufacturing cells
  • Abstracts: Communicating technical ideas persuasively. Continuing education as part of effective risk management. From engineer to entrepreneur: making the transition
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.