Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Australian state OKs euthanasia; rest of country objects

Article Abstract:

The Northern Territory in Australia is the only one of eight states to approve the use of euthanasia. However, the Australian Medical Assn has passed a motion to officially oppose the new statute. Assn Pres Brendan Nelson says that such an attitude could result in a greater devaluation of life in ten years time, and death with dignity is a better choice. A number of Australian social justice groups may petition Australia's federal legislature to override the new law.

Author: Gianelli, Diane M.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1995
Professional Organizations, Administration of Public Health Programs, Physicians & Surgeons, Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists), Medical Associations, Health Programs-State, Health policy, Northern Territory, Medical societies, Australian Medical Association

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Euthanasia measure fails, but backers vow renewed push

Article Abstract:

California's proposed 1992 law legalizing physician-assisted suicide was rejected by voters, but organizers in Washington State and California vow to continue their fight to legalize euthanasia. Three physicians recently proposed a plan in the 'New England Journal of Medicine' under which doctors would supply the lethal medicine but would not deliver the dose themselves. Organizers, however, see doctor involvement as a necessary safeguard against abuse.

Author: Gianelli, Diane M.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1992
California

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Calif. initiative would legalize doctor-assisted euthanasia

Article Abstract:

California's Proposition 161 is a measure on the Nov 1992 ballot that would legalize doctor-assisted euthanasia. Mentally competent, terminally ill patients with fewer than six months to live could authorize a doctor to end their lives. Proposition 161 requires that patients request physician-assisted death at least twice. Those against the proposition contend that there are too few safeguards built into the measure to prevent abuse.

Author: Gianelli, Diane M.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Physicians, Medical professions, Social policy, Ethical aspects, Euthanasia
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Calif. cites finances in rejecting residents' hours limits. Panel urges controls in residency. Work hours finished, 'matured' RPS tackles new issues
  • Abstracts: Medical claims of the future. Educators face likely financial cuts but want to call own shots. Panel wants most paper claims to go the way of the dinosaur
  • Abstracts: D.C. Blues probe raises specter of federal oversight. Insurance commissioners seek tighter rules for Blues. Blues are facing financial pressure, management scrutiny
  • Abstracts: Cost-conscious hospitals set futile care rules. NIH panel backs new gallbladder surgery but vague on credentialing
  • Abstracts: States asking voters to decide range of issues. Asking voters about abortion
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.