Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Norway's decentralized, single-payer health system faces great challenges

Article Abstract:

The structure, strengths and weaknesses of Norway's publicly-funded and operated health care system are described. Health services have been decentralized and are now delivered on three levels: national, county and municipal. National officials set policy and supervise delivery. The counties operate area hospitals and medical services, while municipalities provide primary health services. Employees, employers and the self-employed contribute to the insurance system on a percentage basis. Ninety-five percent of patients are satisfied with their physicians. Primary care physicians are valued. Waiting lists and the lack of patient options are perhaps the greatest drawbacks to the system. However, the Ministry of Health has proposed legislation on patient rights that would permit a second opinion, choice of hospital and other options. A government no-fault system is used to determine compensation for malpractice, which appears to prevent a large number of lawsuits.

Author: Nylenna, Magne
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1995
Social aspects, Medical care, Norway, National health insurance, Single-payer system (Health care), Single payer system (Health care)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Nuremberg and the issue of wartime experiments on US prisoners: the Green Committee

Article Abstract:

The publication of the final report of the Green Committee in JAMA in 1948 probably contributed to the failure of US medical researchers to apply the Nuremberg Code to their research. The Green Committee was headed by a US physician who testified at the Nuremberg Medical Trial following World War II. He refuted the Nazi's claims that US research on prisoners was just as questionable as the Nazi's crimes. He cited the conclusion of his committee even though it had not yet met. When the committee's final report was published in JAMA, it convinced US doctors that prison experiments were ethically acceptable.

Author: Harkness, Jon M.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1996
Cases, Laws, regulations and rules, Crimes against, Human experimentation in medicine, Human medical experimentation, Prisoners, Nuremberg Code, 1947

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Neuroradiology: past, present, future. Roentgen rembered. Making darkness visible: the discovery of x-ray and its introduction into dentistry
  • Abstracts: Student attrition: a challenge for allied health education programs. part 2 Syringe exchange programs - United States, 1994-1995
  • Abstracts: The influence of romantic literature on the medical understanding of pain and suffering - the stimulus to the discovery of anesthesia
  • Abstracts: First class fish. Great American fish story. Fish stories
  • Abstracts: Beans: Make them diet regulars. Dialysis: need for artificial kidney treatment is increasing
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.