Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Marshfield vindicated

Article Abstract:

A federal judge's decision to throw out the remainder of Blue Cross Blue Shield United of Wisconsin's antitrust case against physician-owned Marshfield Clinic represents a victory for physician-owned networks. The decision to throw out the rest of Wisconsin Blue's case is another in a string of court decisions unfavorable to the health insurer; the original verdict, handed down in January 1995, awarded $48.5 million to Wisconsin Blues.

Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1997
Outpatient Care Facilities, Outpatient Care Centers, Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers, Hospital and medical service plans, Medical Care Insurance, Editorial, Ambulatory care facilities, Health insurance, Health insurance industry, Clinics, Marshfield Clinic, Blue Cross Blue Shield United of Wisconsin

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


HMO must cover high-dose chemotherapy treatment

Article Abstract:

A Georgia health maintenance organization refused to authorize recommended high-dose chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation for a 51-year-old woman with metastatic breast cancer. The patient sued in state court, and the case was transferred to federal court, which decided in her favor. An injunction forced the HMO to authorize timely treatment with high-dose chemotherapy before the patient's condition became worse.

Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1997
Breast cancer, Chemotherapy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Texas clinic challenges drug budgets: new law basis of physicians' suit against HMO

Article Abstract:

The Fort Worth Clinic has mounted a legal challenge to its contract with health maintenance organization Methodist Health Plan, saying that the deal violates Texas' Medical Practice Act. The clinic's doctors oppose contract stipulations that, for example, restrict spending on prescriptions to 9.6% of premium dollars. The Medical Practice Act makes it illegal to deny medically needed care based on financial incentives.

Author: Klein, Sarah A.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1998
Administration of Public Health Programs, Offices & clinics of medical doctors, Physicians & Surgeons, Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists), Health Programs-State, Physicians, Medical professions, Health policy, Methodist Health Plan, Fort Worth Clinic

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Health maintenance organizations
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: HMO price war hits East Coast. Trial focus: public unease with physician incentives. HMO market drop could land on physicians
  • Abstracts: Arm tending. Titanic triceps: how Shawn Ray sinks skinny arms. Impressive pecs
  • Abstracts: As discoveries unfold, a new urgency to bring genetic literacy to physicians. Researchers hope techno-teaching will improve cancer pain treatment
  • Abstracts: Managed care trends: the effect on subacute care. Disease management: a challenge to subacute care
  • Abstracts: Limited expansions for kids' coverage draw muted praise. Kudos, concerns for kids' insurance law. Early retiree coverage in doubt: questions surround cost of expanding Medicare
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.