Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

Article Abstract:

Review articles published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews appear to be more useful and current than meta-analyses and reviews published in medical journals. The Cochrane database contains 36 reviews of important clinical topics. Researchers compared these reviews with 39 reviews published in the medical literature in 1995. Reviews in the medical literature contained more authors, trials and patients, but all 36 reviews in the Cochrane database assessed the quality of the trials and half had been updated by 1997. Only 12 of 39 reviews from the literature assessed trial quality and only one had been updated by 1997.

Author: Jadad, Alejandro R. MD, DPhil, Tugwell, Peter MD, MSc, Cook, Deborah J. MD, MSc, Moher, Michael MB, Moher, David MSc
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1998
Evaluation, Medical research, Meta-analysis

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Reviewing the Reviews

Article Abstract:

Scientists who write review articles may focus on the literature of their own country and specialty. Researchers searched the medical literature to identify 89 reviews of chronic fatigue syndrome published between 1980 and 1996. The specialty of the first author was noted as was his or her country of residence and the types of literature cited in the review. Seventy-two percent of the references cited by US authors were from US journals, and 55% of references cited by UK authors were from UK journals.

Author: Joyce, John MB, BCh, MRCPsych, Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia PhD, Wessely, Simon MA, BM, BCh, MSc, MD, FRCP, MRCPsych
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1998
Publishing industry, Authors, Writers, Medical publishing

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews

Article Abstract:

Duplicate publication is the publication of an article that overlaps substantially with an article published elsewhere. A comprehensive list of systematic reviews (1989 through August 15,2002) in anesthesia and analgesia that is accessible on the Internet were examined in this context.

Author: Elm, Erik von, Poglia, Greta, Walder, Bernhard, Tramer, Martin R.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 2004
Medical literature, Reproduction paper, Copy papers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Menstrual mythology and sources of information about menstruation. Selectivity information on desogestrel
  • Abstracts: Recognizing DNA. The promise and problems of meta-analysis. Prometheus's vulture and the stem-cell promise
  • Abstracts: Carb confused? Rediscovering fasting: age-old practice joins modern healthcare. Big fat omissions: science and logic sorely lacking in pro-Atkins article
  • Abstracts: Yoga and breathing. Good lunch!. Let's get it om!
  • Abstracts: The antimicrobial and antifungal activity of a root canal core material. Endometrial adenocarcinoma: beliefs and scepticism
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.