Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Relation Between Prepublication Release of Clinical Trial Results and the Practice of Carotid Endarterectomy

Article Abstract:

Pre-publication news reports about new treatments may cause doctors to prescribe the treatment to patients who may not necessarily benefit. When two two clinical trials of endarterectomy to prevent stroke were pre-published, many doctors began treating patients 80 years old or older. However, the studies were done on younger patients so it wasn't clear whether older patients would benefit.

Author: Bass, Eric B., Powe, Neil R., Gross, Gary P., Steiner, Claudia A.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 2000
Physicians, Medical professions, Medical research, Media coverage, Endarterectomy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Relation Between Pediatric Experience and Treatment Recommendations for Children and Adolescents With Kidney Failure

Article Abstract:

Nephrologists who specialize in pediatrics are more likely to recommend peritoneal dialysis for children with kidney failure than nephrologists who treat adults. A nephrologist is a doctor who specializes in kidney diseases. Children who are referred to an adult nephrologist may receive different treatment than those referred to a pediatric nephrologist.

Author: Powe, Neil R., Furth, Susan L., Hwang, Wenke, Yang, Ching, Neu, Alicia M., Fivush, Barbara A.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 2001
Usage, Pediatricians, Chronic kidney failure, Peritoneal dialysis

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Cost-Utility Analysis of the Cochlear Implant in Children

Article Abstract:

Cochlear implants could ultimately save money even though they are expensive. In a study of 78 profoundly deaf children who received one, the implants saved $53,198 per child when researchers included indirect costs of deafness such as educational expenses.

Author: Rubin, Haya R., Cheng, Andre K., Powe, Neil R., Mellon, Nancy K., Francis, Howard W., Niparko, John K.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 2000
Economic aspects, Reports, Cost benefit analysis, Children, Deaf, Deaf children, Cochlear implants

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Practice, Care and treatment
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Relation between negligent adverse events and the outcomes of medical-malpractice litigation. The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors -- could it do harm?
  • Abstracts: Uneasy alliance: clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry. part 2 The HMO backlash - righteous or reactionary?
  • Abstracts: Confronting a biological armageddon: experts tackle prospect of bioterrorism. IOM Report a Blueprint for Elimination of TB
  • Abstracts: Graduate medical education and water in the soup. The National Health Service Corps and inner-city hospitals. The case for more U.S. medical students
  • Abstracts: Blood pressure and the risk of cardiovascular disease. Relation between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infraction
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.