Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

The purpose of advance medical planning - autonomy for patients or limitation of care?

Article Abstract:

Many doctors may be using advanced directives as a way of limiting medical care. The original purpose of advanced directives was to ensure that the patient's wishes for aggressive treatment would be respected. The SUPPORT study found that many doctors misunderstood their patient's feelings about receiving CPR. This can occur because of communication problems and also because patients may change their mind. Physicians are under a lot of pressure to contain costs and it may be tempting to use an advance directive to achieve this goal.

Author: Levinsky, Norman G.
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1996
Refusal to treat (Medicine), Advance directives (Medicine), Medical care decision-making authority (Law), Medical care decision making authority (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Truth or consequences

Article Abstract:

Physicians should be open and honest with patients when it comes to rationing health care. Rationing health care essentially means denying effective medical care to reduce costs, usually costs incurred by a third party. Rationing is openly discussed in many hospitals but some hospital administrators prefer that patients are not informed when their health care is rationed. This may be unethical and denies the patient the right to protest rationing or go elsewhere for care. It may also destroy the patient's trust in the doctor.

Author: Levinsky, Norman G.
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1998
Health care rationing

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Organ donation by unrelated donors

Article Abstract:

Doctors who seek to increase the supply of donated organs must be careful not to increase the benefit to the patient at the expense of the donor. Surgery to remove an organ from an unrelated living donor is not without risks.

Author: Levinsky, Norman G.
Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 2000
Editorial, Analysis, Donation of organs, tissues, etc., Tissue donation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Ethical aspects
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Breast implants - protection or paternalism? Fixing Medicare. Is academic medicine for sale?
  • Abstracts: A comparison of misoprostol with and without laminaria tents for induction of second-trimester abortion. Acceptability of suction curettage and mifepristone abortion in the United States: a prospective comparison study
  • Abstracts: The control of labor. Implantation and the survival of early pregnancy. Separation of conjoined twins with the twin reversed-arterial-perfusion sequence after prenatal planning with three-dimensional modeling
  • Abstracts: Composite-tissue transplantation - a new frontier. Transplantation of the larynx -- a case report that speaks for itself
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.