Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Health

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Health

Varied heart treatments raise effectiveness questions

Article Abstract:

An article in the New England Journal of Medicine outlines two studies on cardiac care in different regions of the US. A Harvard Medical School study shows that although heart attack patients in Texas undergo cardiac catheterization more frequently, they are not better off than patients in New York, where there is a less frequent rate of catheterization. When adjusted for risk factors, the death rate was higher and quality of life indicators were lower. In a Cleveland Clinic Foundation study, rates of cardiac procedures varied widely from region to region, but did not predict patient outcomes.

Author: Prager, Linda O.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1995
Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences, Research and Testing Services, Heart & Cardiovascular R&D, Research, Cardiac patients, Harvard University. School of Medicine, Cardiovascular research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Joint commission to require outcomes data reports

Article Abstract:

The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations issued new rules for compliance with standards about reporting outcomes and other data. This year hospitals and similar facilities must choose a performance-measurement system from the 60 used by the commission. Next year they must begin submitting data for the system they choose. Provider-sponsored organizations, health plans and other systems have similar new standards with options from several measuring systems.

Author: Prager, Linda O.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1997
Standards, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


High court affirms judges' duty to junk dubious science

Article Abstract:

Defense attorneys and physicians are applauding a Supreme Court decision that emphasizes the role of trial judges in assuring that 'junk science' does not unfairly sway juries. The court's decision is expected to help keep mere speculation by expert witnesses from influencing juries. Critics charge, however, that the ruling will force judges to act as 'amateur scientists.'

Author: Prager, Linda O.
Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: American Medical News
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0001-1843
Year: 1998
Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Rules of Evidence, Cases, Evidence (Law), Evidence, Expert, Expert evidence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Trading restenosis for thrombosis? New questions about drug-eluting stents. Thrombosis of the cerebral veins and sinuses
  • Abstracts: Topical and systemic treatment of psoriasis. What you need to know about ... psoriasis. The effects of psoriasis and its tretment: part 1
  • Abstracts: In vivo studies of cartilage regeneration after damage induced by catabolin/interleukin-1. Magnesium whitlockite deposition in articular cartilage: a study of 80 specimens from 70 patients
  • Abstracts: Corticosteroid therapy for prevention of respiratory distress syndrome in severe preeclampsia. Collaborative trial of prenatal thyrotropin-releasing hormone and corticosteroids for prevention of respiratory distress syndrome
  • Abstracts: A 69-year-old woman with lupus erythematosus and painful skin lesions of the feet. A 42-year-old woman with a pulmonic-valve mass
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.