Why women choose dentistry

Article Abstract:

The reasons why women choose dentistry are discussed, based on discussions with two successful female dentists. Kathryn A. Kell in Davenport, Iowa, was attracted by the opportunities offered for research and contact with people offered by the profession. She is active in local and state professional organizations, as well as being vice chairperson for the American Dental Association Commission on the Young Professional. Dr. Kell suggests that women who consider dentistry should realize that it will occupy the major share of their time. Recognizing what one's priorities are is important in making such a decision. If dentistry seems like the right choice, a woman can structure her career in a variety of ways. A stable practice can be built, a research career can be undertaken, or activities that involve travel can be pursued. Participation in organized dentistry is urged. Patsy K. Fujimoto assisted in her father's dental office, then went on to dental school. She encourages other women who want to become dentists to ''stick to it'' and to persevere in their efforts. Dr. Fujimoto is active in professional associations including the Special Committee on the Young Dentist. She was president of the Hawaii County Dental Society and is assistant professor of dental hygiene at the University of Hawaii. She believes in taking stands on issues she supports, and organized dentistry allows her this opportunity. Dr. Fujimoto does not believe dentistry is different for women than it is for men. (Consumer Summary produced by Reliance Medical Information, Inc.)

Practice, Biography, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Women dentists, Kell, Kathryn, Fujimoto, Patsy

---

Assessing quality in dentistry: dental boards, peer review vary on disciplinary actions

Article Abstract:

Disciplinary action taken against dentists may vary widely between different states. The state board of dental examiners administers an entrance examination and monitors the performance of licensed dentists. The state peer review committee reviews complaints against dentists. A study examined disciplinary actions taken by dental boards in 21 states over a five-year period or more between 1979 and 1987. The number of disciplinary actions taken against dentists varied widely between different states. Colorado had one of the highest rates of disciplinary action, and California had one of the lowest. The activity of peer review committees from 44 states was also evaluated using cases initiated during 1988. The amount of peer review activity differed significantly between the states. A considerable amount of variation existed between the number of cases decided in favor of the patient and the number decided in favor of the dentist in different states.

Standards, Quality management, Dentists, Dentistry

---

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: The war on fraud and its effect on dentistry. Anxiety and pain measures in dentistry: a guide to their quality and application
• Abstracts: Delivery of confidentiality assurances to adolescents by primary care physicians. Relationship between cigarette smoking and health risk and problem behaviors among US adolescents
• Abstracts: Chaparral ingestion: the broadening spectrum of liver injury caused by herbal medications. Human Ingestion of Bacillus anthracis-Contaminated Meat--Minnesota, August 2000
• Abstracts: Assessing constipation. Understanding the structure and function of the skin
• Abstracts: Countering the concerns: how to reinforce dental practice safety. Dental safety needles' effectiveness: results of a one-year evaluation

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.