Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Human resources and labor relations

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Human resources and labor relations

Company must contribute to fund on behalf of owner-employees

Article Abstract:

Double M Trucking Inc. was ordered to make contributions to multiemployer health and welfare fund based on the hours worked by owner-operators and company drivers. In a case filed by Illinois Conference of Teamsters and Employers Welfare Fund against the trucking firm, the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that Double M treated the owner-operators as employees under common law 'right-to-control' test.

Publisher: International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
Publication Name: Benefits Quarterly
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 8756-1263
Year: 1996
Trucking, General Freight Trucking, Trucking & Courier Services, Ex. Air, Double M Trucking Inc.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


What is an employee welfare plan?

Article Abstract:

The surrounding circumstances from which the intended benefits can be determined establish whether informal written or oral communications constitute an employee welfare benefit plan under the ERISA. The decision of the US Court of Appeals for the 3d Circuit in the case of a nursing aide who charged that her employer's misrepresentations entitles her and her husband to relief under ERISA is discussed.

Publisher: International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
Publication Name: Benefits Quarterly
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 8756-1263
Year: 1996
Health insurance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Prevailing wage law not preempted

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court affirmed the district court's ruling in the case involving the Minnesota Chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors and the Minnesota Dept. of Labor and Industry. The appeals court ruled that the ERISA is not preemptive of the Minnesota Prevailing Wage Law because the statute does not 'relate to' an employee benefit plan under ERISA.

Publisher: International Society of Certified Employee Benefit Specialists
Publication Name: Benefits Quarterly
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 8756-1263
Year: 1996
Laws, regulations and rules, Wages, Wages and salaries

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Pensions, Employee benefits
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Bonus must be paid in respect of compulsory maternity leave. Speculation as to the reason for the difference in pay is sufficient to justify pay difference
  • Abstracts: Comfortably safe. DSE Interactive Trainer and Assessor: Croner. Environment on show
  • Abstracts: Companies make wellness work. Make employee ethics your business. Ties to customers make change efforts move faster(FYI)
  • Abstracts: Beliefs about unions and what they should do: a survey of employed Canadians
  • Abstracts: Boost your campus image to attract top grads. Creative staffing drives success. How to recruit online
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.