Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Human resources and labor relations

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Human resources and labor relations

Disputes under ERISA plans: using the claim appeal procedure as the first line of defense

Article Abstract:

Employee benefit plan claim procedures can be designed to limit potential litigation. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) requires that a plan's claim procedures must be exhausted before the claim can be pursued in court. Thus adding steps such as mediation or binding arbitration to the claim procedures can reduce exposure to costly litigation. The claim procedure can also be used to limit the issues and evidence that can be raised in a lawsuit after claim procedures are exhausted.

Author: Braden, Gregory C., Earles, Alison Cline
Publisher: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Publication Name: The Journal of Pension Planning & Compliance
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0148-2181
Year: 1998
Employee benefits, Exhaustion of administrative remedies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Arbitration of ERISA claims

Article Abstract:

The courts have enforced arbitration agreements according to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) for claims against pension plans under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act. Using the FAA, however, raises issues as to whether the result of an arbitrated claim can be enforced. If the claim is brought by those not part of a collective bargaining agreement, they may not have consented to arbitration. The FAA also exempts certain employment contracts from arbitration.

Author: St. Martin, Andree M.
Publisher: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Publication Name: The Journal of Pension Planning & Compliance
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0148-2181
Year: 1995
Collective bargaining, Labor arbitration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The deceptive new world of ERISA preemption

Article Abstract:

US Supreme Court decisions in 1995 and 1997 limited ERISA's power to preempt state law. ERISA's preemptive power has traditionally been unlimited. State laws that provide incentives for pension plans to follow a particular direction may not be preempted. ERISA's preemptive power regarding state causes of action is less certain. Causes of action directly affect benefit claims.

Author: Sacher, Steven J., Pickle, David
Publisher: Aspen Publishers, Inc.
Publication Name: The Journal of Pension Planning & Compliance
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0148-2181
Year: 1998
Exclusive and concurrent legislative powers, Preemption (Legislative power)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Negotiation, mediation and arbitration, Pension funds
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The anatomy of a plant closing. Three-year plan eases the pain of plant closings. A team approach to promotions at Rohr Inc
  • Abstracts: Keeping work and life in balance. Taming the feedback nightmare: The five components of effective feedback. Escape from the seesaw
  • Abstracts: Barriers and constraints to the recruitment and mobility of female managers in the Japanese labor force. The third phase: women as managers
  • Abstracts: An updated look at nonqualified personal pension plans. Synthetic GICs emerge as another tool for stable portfolio
  • Abstracts: The impact of computerised performance monitoring design features on the peformance appraisal process. MRP II: a prospectus for renaissance
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.