Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Human resources and labor relations

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Human resources and labor relations

Final-offer arbitration: risking all on a two-horse race?

Article Abstract:

Final-offer arbitration (FOA) is a major element in the new-style labor agreements that have been adopted in the UK manufacturing sector. FOA differs from traditional arbitration in that the arbitrator is barred from making compromises and is instead required to choose either the final position of the union or the employer. The FOA's winner-take-all system has become increasingly popular in many workplaces since it is believed to promote moderation by encouraging negotiated settlements, as opposed to conventional arbitration which tends to promote drawn-out labor disputes. A survey of 72 plants with new-style agreements affirms this assumption that FOA is superior to conventional arbitration in preventing disputes, particularly when mediation or conciliation is also used. The survey also shows that the use of FOA encourage unions to be less rigid about accepting pay compromises.

Author: Metcalf, David, Milner, Simon
Publisher: Personnel Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Personnel Management
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0031-5761
Year: 1992
Negotiation, mediation and arbitration, Labor relations, Collective labor agreements

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Participation, contigent pay, representation and workplace performance: evidence from Great Britain

Article Abstract:

Most UK companies now operate some form of employee involvement, and many also have a contingent pay scheme. Recent research has considered whether this approach has really brought the benefits which were originally anticipated, focusing on the authoritarian, collective bargaining and employee involvement forms of workplace governance. It was found that no one system is better than the others in all areas, with employee involvement leading to greater productivity but not having a positive impact on industrial relations.

Author: Metcalf, David, Fernie, Sue
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: British Journal of Industrial Relations
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0007-1080
Year: 1995
Research, Participatory management

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Where do we go from here?

Article Abstract:

There are currently very mixed views on the future of the internal labour market (ILM). The trend towards non-union industrial relations will certainly allow attention to be refocused on the employment relationship while certain agents on the worker side do not exist. It is important to realise that workers cannot ever be just passive receptors of initiatives from managers, and that they therefore need to be taken into account when undertaking research on this issue.

Author: Milner, Simon
Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Publication Name: British Journal of Industrial Relations
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0007-1080
Year: 1995
Analysis, Labor market

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The effects of appraisal reviews content on employees' reactions and performance. The differential effects of work- and family-oriented women-friendly HRM on OC and OCB: the case for single female employees in Hong Kong
  • Abstracts: Energising organisations through employee participation. A balanced approach to retraining
  • Abstracts: Technology: training not trauma. Human resources' expanding role in the health care industry. The anonymity factor in questionnaire surveys
  • Abstracts: Outsourcing 401(k) administration yields benefits. Ongoing orientation at Metropolitan Life
  • Abstracts: When things go wrong with temps. Employers search for workers through employment tests and better training. Making the most of temporary workers
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2026 Advameg, Inc.