Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Human resources and labor relations

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Human resources and labor relations

Rationalisation after the event do not constitute GMF defense

Article Abstract:

The decision of Central employment tribunal in Pullen v. Onyx Environments Group is discussed. The defence pleaded that the difference in Ms. Pullen's salary when compared to that of her comparators was on the grounds of genuine material factor. The tribunal rejected the defence of GMF, and went on to add sexual discrimination to the list of offences by the employer.

Author: Slater, Hilary
Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Equal Opportunities Review
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0268-7143
Year: 2005
Sanitary Services, Pollution control industry, Environmental services industry, Onyx Environmental Services

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Equal pay with predecessor and successor in post

Article Abstract:

The decision of Newcastle upon Tyne employment tribunal in Hope v. SITA UK Ltd. is discussed. Ms. Hope filed a case stating that both her predecessor and successor were paid more than her. The tribunal found that the employer had breached the Equal Pay Act and was also guilty of sex discrimination. The tribunal rejected the defence of material difference.

Author: Slater, Hilary
Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Equal Opportunities Review
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0268-7143
Year: 2005

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Different scores cannot provide GMF defense

Article Abstract:

The decision of Bristol employment tribunal in Randall v. DAS Legal Expenses Insurance Company Ltd. is discussed. The defence pleaded that the difference in Ms. Randall's salary when compared to that of her comparators was because of genuine material factor, i.e., differences in appraisal scores. The tribunal rejected the defence.

Author: Slater, Hilary
Publisher: Eclipse Publications Ltd.
Publication Name: Equal Opportunities Review
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0268-7143
Year: 2005

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United Kingdom, Company legal issue, Cases, Sex discrimination against women, Wage gap
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Demolishing a paper tiger: recent legislative changes are affecting site safety. Electricity at work
  • Abstracts: Factors influencing the adjustment of women on global assignments. An application of self-assessment realistic job previews to expatriate assignments
  • Abstracts: Union commitment and participation among Hong Kong firefighters: a development of an integrative model. Evaluating the multi-dimensional view of employee commitment; a comparative UK-China study
  • Abstracts: 2004 collective bargaining round. Main points of the 2004 legislation on the reform of collective bargaining. Proposed reform of the collective bargaining system
  • Abstracts: Equality accord at Peugeot Citroen. New recruitment contract approved. France
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.