Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Human resources and labor relations

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Human resources and labor relations

We can work it out

Article Abstract:

There is a growing tendency among larger companies in the UK to put many forms of work out to tender. Within this trend, large companies are seeking to reduce their liabilities and losses by expecting high standards from their contractors and suppliers. There is a danger that small businesses that fail to acknowledge the need to meet new standards will fail to gain contracted out work. Indeed, a lack of attention to health and safety issues could create significant difficulties for small businesses.

Author: Poidevin, Jackie Le
Publisher: Tolley Publishing Company Ltd. (UK)
Publication Name: Health & Safety at Work
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0141-8246
Year: 1998
Management, Small business

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


EU-wide monitoring system is progressing 'one step at a time'

Article Abstract:

The European Union Occupational Health and Safety Common Monitoring System is taking a long time to establish because of non-standard monitoring methods and incomplete data sources. The standard system will be used to monitor working conditions and their affects on health, but can not be completed until comparible data can be gathered and agreed on. A Europe-wide survey will be carried out in 1996, to establish more details

Publisher: Tolley Publishing Company Ltd. (UK)
Publication Name: Health & Safety at Work
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0141-8246
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Revised standard is breathing new life into RPE programmes

Article Abstract:

The British Standards Institution's publication, entitled 'Guide to Implementing an Effective Respiratory Protection Device Programme', replaces previous guidelines in the use of respiratory protection equipment. The main difference between the new guidelines and those published in 1974 is the use of Assigned Protection Factors as the measure of equipment performance, rather than the use of Nominal Protection Factors.

Publisher: Tolley Publishing Company Ltd. (UK)
Publication Name: Health & Safety at Work
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0141-8246
Year: 2000
Respirators, Respiratory protective equipment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Standards, Occupational health and safety, Occupational safety and health
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: What's wrong with HRIS? The HRIS profession: development and direction
  • Abstracts: Frank Russell stands out on its own. The move towards truly global investment performance standards. Socially responsible investing
  • Abstracts: Persistent systems failures caused Paddington rail disaster, says HSE. User friendly first aid: the Health & Safety Executive's guidance on first aid training makes first aid course more adaptable to employers' needs
  • Abstracts: State of the rail tracks report, 'it's getting worse'. Catalogue of failures led to Ladbroke Grove rail disaster, says HSE
  • Abstracts: Lord Chancellor announces 'deterrent' penalties to come. Rehabilitation v. compensation. Bereaved families to know prosecution dates
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.