Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

International relations

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » International relations

The Biological & Toxin Weapons Convention: recapping events of 2002

Article Abstract:

Biological and toxin weapons (BTW) are destructive in nature and the means to counter them are limited, so about 146 nations signed a treaty in 1972 on Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) to ban the use of such weapons for hostile purposes. The fifth review conference of the BTWC in November 2001 to veto a draft protocol, which was rejected by the U.S, was reconvened in Nov. 2002.

Author: Bailey, Kathleen.C
Publisher: Crane Russak
Publication Name: Comparative Strategy
Subject: International relations
ISSN: 0149-5933
Year: 2003
All Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing, Public affairs, Drugs, Industrial organic chemicals, not elsewhere classified, Biological Warfare Materials, Ethics, Biotechnology industry, Biotechnology industries, Ethical aspects, Biological weapons

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Nuclear proliferation and global security: Laying the groundwork for a new policy agenda

Article Abstract:

Most observers in various organizations assume that despite shortcomings and structural weaknesses in the international nuclear nonproliferation regime all efforts should be expended to preserve it. However, the international community should explore the prospects for a multipolar system of nuclear deterrence in the years ahead and lay to rest the myth that nuclear disarmament is achievable.

Author: O'Neil, Andrew
Publisher: Crane Russak
Publication Name: Comparative Strategy
Subject: International relations
ISSN: 0149-5933
Year: 2005
International Affairs, Nuclear Nonproliferation, International aspects, Security, International, International security

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Contemporary counterinsurgency operations: History as a guide to assist in the development of the joint interagency task force

Article Abstract:

The US should primarily develop standing, multifunctional, capabilities-based joint interagency task forces for counterinsurgency operations to successfully engage and destroy the increasing contemporary insurgent threat. These capabilities, combined with contemporary insurgent vulnerabilities will define the critical capabilities required to derive the counterinsurgency team.

Author: McFadden, Eric M.
Publisher: Crane Russak
Publication Name: Comparative Strategy
Subject: International relations
ISSN: 0149-5933
Year: 2005
International politics, Military policy, Joint operations (Military science), Counterinsurgency

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Government regulation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Corporate social responsibility: Reinventing the meaning of development? Citizenship, accountability and community: The limits of the CSR agenda
  • Abstracts: The conservative consolidation in Iran. Making the world safe for nuclear energy. A nuclear Iran: The reactions of neighbours
  • Abstracts: India-Pakistan deterrence revisited. How robust is India-Pakistan deterrence? Pakistan: transition to what?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.