Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

7th Circuit adds to sex harassment confusion; there now is a cacophony of opinions on liability for supervisors' actions

Article Abstract:

Judges of the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued eight different opinions on Aug 8, 1997 on two consolidated sexual harassment cases, Jansen v. Packaging Corp of America and Ellerth v. Burlington Industries. The cases centered on the standards of liability that should be applied to an employer for the actions of a supervisor. Some judges favored application of strict liability while others were less stringent in judging negligence. Other US appellate courts have also issued confusing sexual harassment decisions. The issue probably demands Supreme Court clarification.

Author: Van Duch, Darryl
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Employer liability, Agency (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Sex stereotyping ruled job bias; 7th Cir. case may expand sexual harassment claims

Article Abstract:

A 1997 7th Circuit employment discrimination decision ruled in favor two teenage boys who claimed that sexual stereotyping of their appearance by other employees constituted a hostile work environment. The plaintiffs maintained the City of Belleville Ill. failed to protect them from hostile male co-workers who perceived the boys to be homosexuals and verbally abused them based on this assumption. The decision has wide implications for other cases of same-sex harassment.

Author: Van Duch, Darryl
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
Employment discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Mitsubishi case alters the rules; EEOC scores a big win in 'pattern and practice' ruling

Article Abstract:

EEOC v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing marks the first use of the pattern-and-practice claim in a sexual harassment case. Long a common tactic in race discrimination cases, the usage here may have lowered the EEOC's burden of proof and made the case harder for Mitsubishi to defend. The court ordered a two-step trial to determine liability, with the individual relief phase coming after the pattern-and-practice one.

Author: Van Duch, Darryl
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America Inc.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Sexual harassment
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The Supreme Court's ruling permitting same-sex harassment suits is one of several employment cases on this term's docket
  • Abstracts: Sixth Circuit fashions two-part test for deductibility of administration expenses
  • Abstracts: Antitrust enforcement; states are likely to be significant players in shaping antitrust enforcement in the new system
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.