Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

A case against both stranded cost recovery and mandatory access

Article Abstract:

The arguments presented by electric utilities and pro-competitiveness groups regarding their debate on the deregulation of the electric power industry lack merit. The stranded cost recovery argument of electric utilities is wrong due to the utilities' assumption of the existence of regulations protecting stranded investments. On the other hand, the mandatory access argument of pro-competitiveness groups is also wrong since it would prevent utilities from allowing the use of its transmission and distribution system by power generators.

Author: Niskanen, William A.
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1996

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Halting steps toward electricity reform

Article Abstract:

The move by the California Utilities Commission (CPUC) to institute changes in its May 1995 decision on electric power industry reforms does not include the opening of the California market to electric power suppliers. The May decision on the establishment of a pool of suppliers was replaced by the 'Independent System Operator' (ISO). Moreover, the provision on the retention of the power exchange as the only source of electric power was retained.

Author: Kean, Steven J.
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1996
California. Public Utilities Commission

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Electric utility reform: shock therapy or managed competition?

Article Abstract:

Rep. Dan Schaefer's bill, the Electricity Consumers' Power to Choose Act of 1996 (HR 37990), seeks to partially deregulate the electric utility industry. Among its provisions is the scrapping of exclusive service franchises is expanding consumer choice. It is still not very clear whether the proposed changes would minimize electric utilities' utility burden, let alone bring down electricity prices for consumers.

Author: Taylor, Jerry
Publisher: Cato Institute
Publication Name: Regulation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0147-0590
Year: 1996
Regulation and Administration of Communications, Electric, Gas, and Other Utilities, Electric Utilities Regulation, Utility regulations, Schaefer, Dan

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Electric utilities, Deregulation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A hybrid solution. Standard terms and conditions. Timeslips flying solo: timekeeping program takes aim at small firms but still needs some work
  • Abstracts: Survivorship life insurance for estate preservation and creation. Estate taxes - now or later?
  • Abstracts: Tort reformers race against time to pass a bill. Tort reformers try again - modestly
  • Abstracts: The canonization of Holmes and Brandeis: epistemology and judicial reputations. The creation of a usable judicial past: Max Lerner, class conflict, and the propagation of judicial titans
  • Abstracts: Issue of physician-assisted suicide confronted by courts and legislatures. Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act adopted
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.