Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

A fatal result to a staged accident; after a fraud scheme goes awry, a California lawyer is tried for murder

Article Abstract:

Prosecutors in the California trial of lawyer Gary Miller failed in their use of a new legal theory to hold the lawyer criminally liable for the foreseeable consequences of his acts, which in his case was payment of participants in an insurance fraud ring which staged auto accidents. It was allegedly foreseeable that at some point the automobile accidents might be fatal, which was what had occurred in this case. Miller was acquitted of murder but convicted of insurance fraud and conspiracy.

Author: Hansen, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
Criminal liability, Insurance fraud, Miller, Gary, Foreseeability (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Cruel and unusual? ACLU vows to challenge California law requiring castration for certain convicted child molesters

Article Abstract:

The Northern California ACLU will challenge a state law which orders castrating some convicted child molesters. The ACLU claims the law is unconstitutional, besides lacking a scientific foundation. Legal issues include due process, privacy, equal protection, cruel and unusual punishment. Ten other states have similar laws under consideration. Susan Carpenter-McMillan, the lobbyist who wrote the law, is also proposing that repeat offenders be marked for life with a single handcuff.

Author: Hansen, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Laws, regulations and rules, Child sexual abusers, Castration

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


No vindication for convicted ex-cop; judge finds bungling, but no evidence of a frame-up in murder investigation

Article Abstract:

A Wisconsin judge has ruled that former Milwaukee policewoman Lawrencia Bembenek was not the victim of a conspiracy to frame her for the murder of her husband's ex-wife. After a 10-month investigation, the judge ruled that mistakes were made, but that these resulted from poor judgment and inadequate procedures rather than intentional acts.

Author: Hansen, Mark
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Testimony, Conspiracy, Bembenek, Lawrencia

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, California, Murder
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Diallo family looks for its second act; after acquittals, civil lawyers, feds consider their legal options. Litigating the reach of RICO; can a statute aimed at the Mafia apply to foes of abortion?
  • Abstracts: Jerry's judges; presidential candidate Jerry Brown radically remade the face of the California judiciary while governor there
  • Abstracts: Battle on legal ads comes down to class; some deride 'reform' movement as elitist. Calif. court bars solicitation suit; it's a disciplinary matter
  • Abstracts: Entry analysis under the 1992 horizontal merger guidelines. Merger analysis in the '90s: the guidelines and beyond - overview
  • Abstracts: The new term; high-court watchers wonder if the middle will hold. Justices consider protests that get rough
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.