Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

A few comments about the proposed revisions to UCC section 2-207: the battle of the forms taken to the limit of reason

Article Abstract:

Uniform Commercial Code section 2-207, created during the 1950s, was written to clarify the legal nature of a sale of tangible goods whose transaction was marked by an exchange of forms as well as money. Forms include purchase order, invoice, and terms of sale. Legal questions surrounded whether an agreement to buy was a contract or a counter offer and how terms written in fine print apply to a transaction mostly concerned with type of good and price. Forty years of code revision has done little to clarify such matters as consumer protection and product warranty.

Author: White, Phillip A.
Publisher: Commercial Law League of America
Publication Name: Commercial Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-3055
Year: 1998
United States, Sales & Orders, Sales

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Estoppel and Section 2-201 of the Uniform Commercial Code

Article Abstract:

The Uniform Commercial Code needs to be amended to allow the application of estoppel, as addressed in Section 1-103, to Section 2-201. Most courts support the application of estoppel in Section 2-201, but some do not, claiming that doing so might allow remedies in cases involving a simple refusal to honor an oral agreement. Amending the code to allow estoppel for Section 2-201 would create more uniform interpretations by the courts and increase the Code's uniformity.

Author: Bellomy, Christopher M.
Publisher: Commercial Law League of America
Publication Name: Commercial Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-3055
Year: 1995
Fraud, Estoppel

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


An analysis of surety discharge under Uniform Commercial Code section 3-605

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the common law of surety and U.C.C. section 3-605 surety discharge with specificity. A discussion of surety defenses is included.

Author: Gorham, Charles
Publisher: Commercial Law League of America
Publication Name: Commercial Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-3055
Year: 1999
States, Extinguishment of debts, Debt cancellation, Suretyship and guaranty, Guarantees, Sureties

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Commercial law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Lawyers can revive their profession's image by rededicating themselves to their basic mission. Jurors prefer lawyers who are well-prepared - and not arrogant
  • Abstracts: Further comments on PCT/USA national phase applications and section 102(e) dates. Traversing the section 112, paragraph six field of land mines: does In re Donaldson adequately defuse the problems?
  • Abstracts: State aid reform: Some reflections on the need to revise the notice on guarantees. Economic analysis and antitrust damages
  • Abstracts: Tortuous journey to justice. Proposition 211: a random tax on investors. State court restrictions on the employment-at-will doctrine
  • Abstracts: The Delaware Supreme Court, in two recent decisions, has clarified the application of the corporate-opportunity doctrine
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.