Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Aggravation and mitigation in capital cases: what do jurors think?

Article Abstract:

Jurors apply moral standards when determining sentences in capital cases. Results of the Capital Juror Project evidence that generally recognized moral standards are applied when jurors weigh aggravating and mitigating factors. The results are the product of an extensive survey of jurors who answered specific questions regarding the motivations underlying their sentencing decisions. Mitigating factors most often indicate lack of intent or capacity to commit homicide, while aggravating factors indicate heinousness, dangerousness, and social pathology.

Author: Garvey, Stephen P.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1998
Surveys, Public opinion, Extenuating circumstances

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


In state legislatures we trust? The "compelling interest" presumption and religious free exercise challenges to state civil rights laws

Article Abstract:

The author discusses First Amendment challenges brought in state courts by religious groups opposing application of civil rights laws prohibiting discrimination based on marital status or sexual orientation. Adoption of a judicial rule by federal and state courts which presumes that a state civil right law serves a compelling governmental interest is proposed.

Author: Vaitayanonta, Jack S.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 2001
Freedom of speech, Freedom of association, Civil rights

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Free exercise rights of capital jurors

Article Abstract:

The author argues that the US Supreme Court should apply the principle of strict scrutiny to the exclusion from capital cases of potential jurors whose views on the death penalty might impair their ability to reach an impartial verdict.

Author: Galle, Brian
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 2001
Social aspects

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Capital punishment, Jury members, Freedom of religion
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Car wars: valuation standards in Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases. Rake's progress: cure and reinstatement of secured claims in bankruptcy reorganization
  • Abstracts: Arbitration makes sense in international intellectual property disputes
  • Abstracts: Market definition and differentiated products: the need for a workable standard. A workable rule of reason: a less ambitious antitrust role for the federal courts
  • Abstracts: Creating a private foundation offers many advantages. New regulations sanction 'accelerated' charitable lead trusts
  • Abstracts: Air pollution- the inside story. Pesticide for pole vaulting. The trouble with implementing TMDLs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.